science-figure-for-journal
From the author
Use when a figure has to survive peer review and print — when choosing a figure type for a comparison, a distribution, a paired design or a survival curve; when a journal demands specific column widths, minimum type size, vector formats or resolutions; when error bars must state what they are; when a figure came back from review as "unreadable" or "insufficient resolution"; also use when deciding whether a bar chart is the wrong choice.
Install
npx skills add yzlin286-wq/Deepscient --skill science-figure-for-journal -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/science-figure-for-journal/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 87
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- sci-figuresbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to finalize Science display items — panel/word budget, column-width sizing, minimum font sizes, color-accessibility, and showing the data (points over bars). Enforces figure rigor before submission.Science★ 1.4K
- figure-styleaipoch/open-sciencePublication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots. Use for a figure that will ship in a report, paper, export, or kept artifact. Covers data fidelity, label economy, color threading, chart choice, layout, and render-then-verify QA without imposing a visual house style. For multi-panel composition use `figure-composer`; for whole-paper ordering use `paper-narrative`.Testing★ 5.5K
- figuresbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsDesign and format publication-quality figures: chart choice, color, scales, legends, captions, reproducibility.Design★ 4.9K
- scientific-figuregaasher/Agent-Loop-SkillsUse when the user has scientific data (or a prompt alluding to scientific data) and wants a publication-quality figure made from it. A generator drafts and renders a figure that lands a frozen communication goal; an adversarial critic critiques it hard and grades it 1-5 per axis against a fixed rubric (message, aesthetic, clarity, integrity, and a conditional domain-completeness axis), aggregates to 0-100, and decides pass; the generator revises against the critic's findings until the grade clears a threshold or the budget is hit. Both roles may consult the literature (Semantic Scholar + arXiv) to verify domain content (e.g. a pathway figure's gene set, or a benchmark's reported numbers), and conform to / grade against a named journal's figure spec fetched via web search. Not for writing a paper or analyzing a dataset, and not for editing an existing finished image — this renders a figure from data/brief and iterates on it.Science★ 180
- scientific-writergaasher/Agent-Loop-SkillsUse when the user has a scientific draft (with its dataset, figures, and optional analysis code) and wants it iteratively revised until it clears a quality bar. Five specialist judges (figures, scientific content, style, formatting, code) critique the draft; a fresh, independent peer_reviewer grades it on those same axes (1-5 each → a percentage) with honesty guardrails; a scientific_writer revises prose, figures, and code — regenerating figures by running the user's plot command — until the peer-review score clears the threshold or the budget is hit. Not for writing a paper from a blank page, and not for a standalone literature survey.Science★ 180
- science-statistics-choiceyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when you have data and must decide which test to run — when someone asks "该用什么检验", when a reviewer says the analysis does not match the design, when assumptions are violated and you need the honest fallback instead of the convenient one, when the effect size or correction method is missing from the results, or when a p-value is being asked to carry a claim it cannot carry; also use before data collection to size the study, and when interpreting a result that is significant but tiny.Science★ 845
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in