science-rebuttal-playbook
From the author
Use immediately after receiving reviewer reports, when a revision decision says major revision, or when you disagree with a reviewer; covers the numbered-response structure, how to split fixable from arguable points, why unprincipled compliance backfires, and how to escalate a genuine disagreement to the editor.
Install
npx skills add yzlin286-wq/Deepscient --skill science-rebuttal-playbook -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/science-rebuttal-playbook/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 87
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- sci-rebuttalbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse after Science reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and honest about limits. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.Science★ 1.4K
- cell-rebuttalbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse after Cell reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize the (often substantial) new experiments by impact × feasibility, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and closes the "completeness" gaps reviewers demand. Do not run before the experiments and revision are actually done.Other★ 1.4K
- rebuttal-and-response-to-reviewersKalarisLabs/research-agent-skillsPlan and write responses to peer review, including journal "response to reviewers" letters for revise-and-resubmit, conference rebuttals under strict length limits (OpenReview/ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML, ACL ARR, CVPR), author responses to meta-reviews, and appeals. Use when a user receives reviews, must triage reviewer comments, draft point-by-point replies, decide what new experiments to run, disagree respectfully with a reviewer, or track manuscript changes for a revision. For authors answering reviews of their own manuscript; to write a review of someone else's paper, use peer-review instead.Science★ 103
- rebuttalwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepWorkflow 4: Submission rebuttal pipeline. Parses external reviews, enforces coverage and grounding, drafts a safe text-only rebuttal under venue limits, and manages follow-up rounds. Use when user says "rebuttal", "reply to reviewers", "ICML rebuttal", "OpenReview response", or wants to answer external reviews safely.Productivity★ 18.7K
- pnas-rebuttalbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse after PNAS reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and honest about limits. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.Other★ 1.4K
- nejm-rebuttalbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse after NEJM reviews arrive — often including a dedicated statistical reviewer and an editor letter — to triage the decision, answer statistical comments rigorously, and draft a point-by-point response that quotes each comment, the response, and the revised manuscript text. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.Writing★ 1.4K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in