science-study-coach-flow
From the author
Use when someone is starting research and does not know the order of operations — a first-year student asking "从哪开始", "这一步要做什么", "我这样算不算做完了"; when a project feels stuck and it is unclear which prerequisite is actually missing; when explaining what a complete study requires end to end; when deciding whether the next move is reading, planning, collecting, analysing or writing. Also use before writing a Methods section, to prove every step actually happened.
Install
npx skills add yzlin286-wq/Deepscient --skill science-study-coach-flow -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/science-study-coach-flow/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 87
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- learntw93/WazaRuns a six-phase research workflow from source bundle to publish-ready output. Use when researching an unfamiliar domain or compiling materials into one reference. Not for quick lookups or single-file reads.Science★ 7.5K
- science-discipline-methodsyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when a research question is still a question rather than a plan — when you know the field but not which study design the field accepts, how many samples it demands, which measurements count as evidence, or which software is standard; also use when a review came back saying the design cannot answer the question, when you are switching fields or advising a student in an unfamiliar one, when two supervisors disagree about method, or when you need to know what reviewers in that field attack first before you commit months to a protocol.Science★ 845
- life-coachmagnus919/agent-skillsGuide a bounded, user-led coaching process for personal goals, decisions, transitions, habits, recurring nonclinical patterns, accountability, and progress review. Use when a person explicitly asks to be coached, wants reflective challenge, or wants help examining ambivalence while retaining ownership. Do not use for therapy, crisis support, diagnosis, direct factual or action requests, product or stakeholder discovery, or medical, legal, financial, addiction, domestic-violence, or other specialist advice.Science★ 165
- starttranhieutt/software_development_departmentGuides first-time onboarding by asking where the user is in their project journey, then routing them to the right workflow. Use at the beginning of a new session without context, or when the user runs /start for the first time.Productivity★ 74
- sci-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding which sci-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a manuscript from significance test through reviewer rebuttal for Science (AAAS). Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.Productivity★ 1.4K
- researchdanjdewhurst/story-skillsThis skill should be used when the user asks to "research", "fact-check", "check the history", "is this accurate", "research notes", "sources", "historical accuracy", "technical accuracy", "how would this really work", "verify a detail", "interview an expert", "plan a site visit", "expert review", or needs to investigate and record the real-world facts a story relies on and the chapters that use them.Science★ 389
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in