science-journal-intel
From the author
Use when you need to know how a journal actually behaves rather than what its aims-and-scope page claims — its real subfield mix over the last two years, first-round review duration and comment difficulty from authors, Chinese-author review speed and accept-rate wording; also use when a manuscript was rejected for "scope" and you need evidence about which journals genuinely publish that kind of work.
Install
npx skills add yzlin286-wq/Deepscient --skill science-journal-intel -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/science-journal-intel/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- science-journal-selectionyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when choosing where to submit, when a paper was desk-rejected without review, when deciding between a top journal and a solid sub-journal, or when planning the submission chain; covers the three-tier strategy, why scope beats prestige, format red lines, and how to use transfer and portable-review routes.Science★ 92
- journal-selectionbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when choosing a target journal for a paper, comparing journal rankings, asking "where should I submit this", or building a submission strategy across multiple journals. Field-agnostic — detects the paper's research area and suggests appropriate outlets across tiers.Science★ 4.8K
- science-top-journal-writingyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when drafting or restructuring a manuscript for a high-impact journal, when a paper was rejected for "limited conceptual advance" or "not of broad interest", or when the abstract and title need to carry the claim; covers the C-C-C structure, the five-sentence abstract, figure-first ordering, and the Introduction funnel.Science★ 92
- science-discipline-methodsyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when a research question is still a question rather than a plan — when you know the field but not which study design the field accepts, how many samples it demands, which measurements count as evidence, or which software is standard; also use when a review came back saying the design cannot answer the question, when you are switching fields or advising a student in an unfamiliar one, when two supervisors disagree about method, or when you need to know what reviewers in that field attack first before you commit months to a protocol.Science★ 92
- science-manuscript-formattingyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when a manuscript draft needs to become a submittable file — you have the content (from science_paper_plan or your own draft) and now need it in the target journal's actual layout; also use when a submission was desk-rejected for formatting (word count over, too many figures, uncited references, wrong reference style), when the same paper must be retargeted from one journal to another without rewriting, or when a submission system demands DOCX or JATS rather than PDF.Science★ 92
- sci-rebuttalbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse after Science reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and honest about limits. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.Science★ 1.3K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in