evidence-review
From the author
Build evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses where adjacent-domain evidence, candidate records, unpublished work, and unsupported claims must be kept separate.
Install
npx skills add yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit --skill evidence-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/evidence-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 76
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- literature-reviewK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsConducts systematic, scoping, and narrative literature reviews using PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, and other appropriate sources. Use for research synthesis, reproducible literature searches, screening, citation checking, or preparing Markdown and PDF reviews. Tracks search coverage, records versus studies, and evidence limitations; supports meta-analysis planning but does not supply a meta-analysis engine.Engineering★ 54.5K
- build-evidence-mapgithub/awesome-copilotBuild an auditable evidence map for a contested technical choice, research synthesis, proposal review, or consequential decision. Use when Copilot must preserve supporting, contradicting, qualifying, and missing evidence with exact source regions instead of collapsing disagreement into prose.Science★ 40.4K
- peer-reviewforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsStructured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.Engineering★ 3.8K
- research-architect-evidencemmTheBest/Research-ArchitectUse when executed research materials, results, observations, analyses, or draft claims need to become a Research Architect evidence bank, claim register, manuscript-wide display sequence, panel-level evidence map, and bounded interpretation trail.Science★ 69
- verify-claimsShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skillsAudit load-bearing paper claims against evidence in results, tables, figures, experiments, or citations. Use for claim audits, overclaiming checks, first or state-of-the-art claims, significant-result wording, prose-table number mismatches, and camera-ready or rebuttal evidence checks.Science★ 55
- argument-governanceyha9806/academic-writing-toolkitBuild and audit the manuscript or research-project argument system across intended use, gaps, claims, data, results, experiment roles, contributions, innovation evidence, limitations, and contribution focus. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or research project needs an explicit argument map, evidence-fit or over/under-balance checks, analysis admission, contribution prioritisation, innovation-evidence checks, or a decision about whether the current emphasis should change; also use for Chinese requests such as 梳理研究项目、研究主线、贡献侧重、创新证据、结果是否支撑论点、主实验与辅助分析、内容或证据是否过多或过少.Science★ 50
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in