ai-development-guide
From the author
Applies root-cause analysis, impact inspection, and completeness checks without expanding approved scope. Use when fixing bugs, refactoring, reviewing quality, or resolving unexpected implementation evidence.
Install
npx skills add shinpr/agentic-code --skill ai-development-guide -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/ai-development-guide/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 82
Security100
Provenance60
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption31
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- reviewOutlineDriven/outline-driven-developmentUse when asked to review a pull request, examine code changes, find bugs, or audit a branch, in standard or depth mode. Not for an iterative review-and-fix loop: use audit-project.Engineering★ 55
- root-cause-debuggingthiientv/godmodeInvestigates a bug, failing test, build error, regression, flaky behavior, performance symptom, or unexpected result by reproducing it, minimizing the case, testing ranked hypotheses, tracing the first incorrect state, and locking the root cause with a regression check. Use before proposing a fix. Not for planning a new feature or reviewing a healthy diff.Engineering★ 99
- debugarbiterForge/codeArbiterInvestigate an unexplained defect or unexpected behavior without changing application code. Use for root-cause diagnosis and an evidence-backed handoff, including a bounded unresolved result. Not for implementing a known fix, new features, or explanation-only questions.Engineering★ 149
- investigatetestdouble/hanEvidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.Finance★ 331
- architecture-reviewthiientv/godmodeReviews an existing codebase for structural friction, unclear ownership, leaky or shallow interfaces, excessive coupling, misplaced state, poor testability, and risky dependency direction, then prioritizes evidence-backed improvement candidates. Use for architecture audits, modularization, modernization, or recurring cross-cutting change pain. Not for designing one new interface, simplifying a local function, or fixing a reproduced bug.Planning★ 99
- ai-debugarcasilesgroup/ai-engineeringFinds the root cause of broken behaviour and names it at file:line, then writes the check that fails for that reason before changing anything. Also resolves merge and rebase conflicts by intent rather than by taking a side. Trigger for "it's not working", "this used to work", "I'm getting an error", "CI is failing", "why is X happening", "I have conflicts", "the rebase failed". Not for adding test coverage to working code — use /ai-verify. Not for exploring an unfamiliar area — use /ai-explore. Not for designing the fix — once the cause is named, use /ai-orchestrator. Not for reporting the fault to outsiders — use /ai-issue-report.Engineering★ 62
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in