self-review
From the author
Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before submitting (blocking issues + dead code) vs what to leave for the actual review. Report-only — does not edit files.
Install
npx skills add modem-dev/ossrules --skill self-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/self-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 80
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- code-reviewanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsReview code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.OfficialEngineering★ 32.8K
- peer-reviewtobihagemann/turboRun an independent peer review via Claude. Use when the user asks to "peer review", "peer review my code", "peer review my plan", "get a second opinion", or "independent review".Engineering★ 416
- Pre-Landing Self-Reviewagentskillexchange/skillsStructured self-review checklist to run before committing substantial code changes. Covers edge cases, error paths, test coverage, documentation, and code quality — so CI is a last resort, not your first reviewer.Engineering★ 58
- requesting-code-reviewGanyuanRan/AegisUse when requesting independent code review, after implementation slices, before merging high-risk work, or when verification exposes evidence, baseline, architecture, compatibility, or retirement uncertainty.Engineering★ 1.4K
- pr-code-reviewerthiientv/godmodeReviews a GitHub pull request or focused branch diff for correctness, regressions, security, compatibility, test gaps, and maintainability. Use when an implementation needs an independent source-aware review before merge. Produces prioritized findings with evidence and actionable fixes. Not for architecture-only audits, formatting preferences, or processing existing review feedback.Engineering★ 99
- pr-reviewMindrally/skillsFocused pull request review practices with severity-ranked, file-and-line-cited findings across four angles: security, performance, tests, and architecture. Use when asked to review a pull request, review a diff or set of changes, review "this PR," or provide a code review before merge.Engineering★ 286
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in