sdlc-doubt
From the author
Adversarially re-checks a non-trivial technical decision in a fresh context by stripping the conclusion and asking an independent reviewer to find problems. 对刚做出的非平凡技术决策发起对抗式独立复查——把决策剥离结论后交给全新上下文的审查者"找问题"。Use when 影响ER或公共组件的决策回写前、复杂SQL/状态机流转定稿前、技术方案选型二选一定稿前、提交前对"已全范围检查"断言存疑时、用户说"这个判断我不放心""帮我质疑一下这个方案""这个方案稳不稳""doubt-review"。
Install
npx skills add TsCarpe/claude-sdlc-skills --skill sdlc-doubt -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/sdlc-doubt/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 82
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- adversarial-reviewa5c-ai/babysitterFresh adversarial code review with binary PASS/FAIL verdicts, evidence citations, and anchoring bias prevention via fresh reviewer spawning.Engineering★ 1.9K
- doubt-driven-developmentaddyosmani/agent-skillsSubjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production auth, security-sensitive logic, a high-stakes migration, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.Security★ 111.3K
- doubt-driven-reviewBlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboardIn-flight adversarial check on a non-trivial decision BEFORE it stands — distinct from post-hoc review of a finished diff. Use on "stress-test this decision", "are we sure about this", "verify before commit", "poke holes in this", when working in unfamiliar code, or before an irreversible step (migration, prod deploy, public API). Runs earlier than code-review, while course-correction is cheap.Engineering★ 335
- sdlc-gateTsCarpe/claude-sdlc-skillsRuns the mandatory risk-tiered review gate after technical design and test cases are finalized: adversarial review by fresh-context subagents (4 for tier A / 2 for tier B / main-session self-check for tier C), producing an issue list and divergence list for human adjudication before development or test execution. Also checks the development entry before development starts. 评审关口:设计与用例定稿后的强制评审,按风险分级分档对抗评审(A 级 4 子代理 / B 级 2 个 / C 级主会话自查)产出 issue 与分歧清单,人工裁决后放行开发/测试;用户要求开始开发、直接开发、拆任务、写代码或实现功能时使用——即使未评审或用户要求跳过。Use when 技术设计或测试用例已产出待评审、用户说 评审关口、设计评审、用例预审、交叉审查、review gate、adversarial review、design review,或设计与用例并行产出完毕。用法:/sdlc-gate 需求名Testing★ 65
- decision-challengeericrisco/rsc-harnessUse when a high-impact plan, migration or architecture claim needs a bounded adversarial challenge before commitment. Isolates claims from persuasion, attacks assumptions, reconciles doubts with evidence and emits proceed/hold/stop. NOT a finished-diff review (`review`/`code-review`), NOT SDD artifact consistency (`analyze`).Planning★ 350
- evaluate-findingstobihagemann/turboCritically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to "evaluate findings", "assess review comments", "triage review feedback", "evaluate review output", or "filter false positives".Engineering★ 417
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in