edc-data-validation
From the author
Generate code for EDC export validation, clinical data range checks, cross-form consistency checks, SDTM structure validation, controlled terminology verification, and define.xml generation. Use when the user asks to validate clinical trial data exports, check vital sign or lab value ranges, verify AE date consistency, validate SDTM datasets against CDISC rules, generate define.xml, or build an automated data review pipeline. Triggers include "EDC validation", "range check clinical data", "cross-form consistency", "SDTM validation", "controlled terminology check", "define.xml generation", "Medidata Rave export", "Oracle InForm", "Veeva Vault CDMS", "clinical data cleaning", "edit check", "data query", "SDTM structure check", "lab range check", "vital signs validation", "AE date check", "protocol deviation detection", "OpenCDISC", "Pinnacles 21", "P21 validation".
Install
npx skills add awslabs/hcls-agent-skills --skill edc-data-validation -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/edc-data-validation/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 82
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- cdisc-complianceawslabs/hcls-agent-skillsReason about CDISC SDTM and ADaM implementation for regulatory submissions. Use when the user asks about SDTM domain mapping, ADaM dataset design, controlled terminology versioning, define.xml completeness, FDA or PMDA submission requirements, query prioritization by clinical impact, SUPPQUAL usage, or CDISC compliance review. Triggers include "SDTM mapping", "ADaM dataset", "CDISC compliance", "controlled terminology", "define.xml", "FDA submission data", "PMDA submission", "SDTM domain", "ADSL", "ADAE", "ADLB", "BDS structure", "SUPPQUAL", "RELREC", "value-level metadata", "CDISC CT", "regulatory submission data standards", "eCTD datasets", "SDTM 3.3", "ADaM 1.1", "query prioritization", "clinical data review".Legal★ 69
- icdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation for an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) paper - mining-task definition, strong and fairly-tuned baselines, ablations that isolate the named mechanism, scalability curves that test scale claims, and discovery-validity checks that separate real findings from evaluation artifacts.Testing★ 1.3K
- analytical-method-validationK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsPlans, executes, and documents validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.Testing★ 55.4K
- dac-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evaluation of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering standard EDA benchmark suites (ISPD, EPFL, ISCAS/ITC, TAU, CircuitNet, OpenROAD flows), fair state-of-the-art baselines, QoR/PPA reporting with runtime, per-benchmark honesty, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and contamination-aware ML-for-EDA evaluation.Design★ 1.3K
- doc-claim-validatorNickCrew/Claude-CortexValidate that claims in documentation match codebase reality. Extracts verifiable assertions (file paths, commands, function references, behavioral claims, dependencies) from markdown docs and checks them against the actual project. Use after code changes, before releases, or when docs feel untrustworthy.Engineering★ 62
- eacl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the empirical evidence for an EACL paper, covering tuned and LLM baselines, multilingual breadth matched to the claim, significance and variance floors, human-evaluation agreement, data-contamination controls, ablations, and error taxonomies, so that every stated result is measured rather than asserted.Science★ 1.3K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in