conjoint-diagnostics
From the author
Reviews an existing conjoint study for threats to inference and returns severity-ranked findings on design integrity, estimation, measurement error, external validity, and interpretation, including the guardrail against reading an AMCE as majority preference. Use when the user asks whether a conjoint design or analysis holds up, has referee comments on a conjoint, or wants a second opinion on estimation or interpretation. New designs go to conjoint-design, reshaping to conjoint-cleaning.
Install
npx skills add scdenney/open-science-skills --skill conjoint-diagnostics -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/conjoint-diagnostics/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
No download: this skill’s licence (Custom or unclear) does not let us redistribute its files. The install commands fetch them from GitHub instead.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 77
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- conjoint-designscdenney/open-science-skillsDesigns conjoint and factorial-vignette experiments, covering attribute architecture and randomization restrictions, effective-N power, treatment realism, the choice among AMCE, marginal-mean, and AMIE estimands, forced-choice versus rating designs, and PAP tiers. Use when the user is planning a conjoint, drafting or critiquing an attribute table, asking how many respondents or tasks are needed, whether to report AMCEs or marginal means, or how to test interactions. Reviewing an existing design goes to conjoint-diagnostics, cleaning the export to conjoint-cleaning.Design★ 69
- conjoint-cleaningscdenney/open-science-skillsTurns a raw Qualtrics conjoint export into an analysis-ready long-format dataset, covering export settings, identifying the implementation, package or manual wide-to-long reshaping, choice-profile alignment, ratings, reference categories, pilot exclusion, and subgroup merges. Use when the user has a conjoint CSV to clean, reshape, or debug, cannot align choices with profiles, or asks what the data must look like before AMCE estimation. Design goes to conjoint-design, validity review to conjoint-diagnostics.Data★ 69
- solution-designthiientv/godmodeExplores ambiguous product or engineering intent before implementation, clarifies users, constraints, alternatives, risks, and acceptance criteria, and turns the result into an approved design direction. Use for a new feature, subsystem, creative UI, architecture change, or unclear request. Not for an already-scoped bug fix, an existing implementation plan, or a narrow code review.Design★ 99
- architecture-reviewathola/claude-night-marketAssesses architecture decisions, ADR compliance, and coupling. Use when evaluating design changes or validating structural decisions before merging.Planning★ 343
- architect-analyzetikalk/adlc-team-skillsUse when validating generated or refined architecture artifacts, before feature development, during architecture review, or periodically to detect ADR↔AD drift, completeness gaps, and quality issues.Planning★ 143
- adjudicate-reviewpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowTurn an incoming set of findings — from an AI reviewer, a referee report, a code review, a linter, or a second model — into verified fixes, without letting a confident misread damage correct work. Every finding is a CANDIDATE until checked against the actual source. Use whenever you receive review comments, audit findings, or a critique you did not write yourself, especially when the reviewer is a model or when the volume is too large to check by feel.Engineering★ 1.7K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in