lov-code-review
From the author
审查实际差异中的正确性、安全和维护风险并给出可定位意见。支持明确输入与结果回读。Use to review a code change for actionable defects.
Install
npx skills add lovstudio/skills --skill lov-code-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/lov-code-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 76
Security85
Provenance62
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption33
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- Reviewing CodeMicrock/ordinary-claude-skillsSystematically evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment. Use when reviewing PRs, assessing code quality, or verifying implementation against requirements.Engineering★ 408
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsGive advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.Engineering★ 1.4K
- review-codetobihagemann/turboReview code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", "check for bugs", "scan for bugs", "review correctness", "security audit", "find vulnerabilities", "review security", "check API usage", "verify against docs", "check for cross-file duplication", "review consistency", "check for code reuse", "review simplicity", "find untested code", "find redundant tests", or "review test coverage".Engineering★ 416
- code-reviewinghuangjia2019/claude-code-engineeringReview code for quality, security, and best practices. Use when the user asks for code review, wants feedback on their code, mentions reviewing changes, or asks about code quality.Engineering★ 1.1K
- code-auditarcasilesgroup/ai-engineeringReview code for correctness bugs, concurrency and lifecycle errors, type-safety holes, error handling gaps, API-contract breaks, and maintainability problems, with every finding gated on a concrete failure scenario. Use when asked to review code, check a diff or branch for bugs, look for problems before committing or opening a PR, or assess code quality.Engineering★ 61
- secure-code-reviewnahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcherReview a change or a codebase for security defects with a deliberate reading order — where bugs cluster, trace source to sink, confirm reachability, and write a finding someone can actually fix. Use when asked to security-review a pull request, feature or repository, or before shipping anything touching auth, money, tenancy, uploads or secrets. Not a scanner run (its output is leads), not design-stage threat modeling, and not a penetration test — nothing here authorizes touching a running system.Engineering★ 59
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in