alterlab-hypothesis-gen
From the author
Formulates structured, testable hypotheses from experimental observations using a scientific-method framework — derives predictions, proposes mechanisms, and designs experiments to test them, then renders a LaTeX report. Use when turning observations or data into falsifiable, mechanistic hypotheses, competing-explanation sets, testable predictions, or experimental designs. For a standalone systematic literature review or evidence synthesis (not a means to hypotheses) use alterlab-literature-review; for open-ended brainstorming before any specific observation use alterlab-scientific-brainstorm; to evaluate an existing manuscript use alterlab-peer-review. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.
Install
npx skills add AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills --skill alterlab-hypothesis-gen -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/alterlab-hypothesis-gen/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- alterlab-scientific-brainstormAlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-SkillsCreative research ideation and exploration for open-ended brainstorming, surfacing interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, and identifying research gaps. Use when starting early-stage research planning with no specific observations yet — for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring cross-disciplinary connections, or finding gaps. For formulating testable hypotheses from observations or data use alterlab-hypothesis-gen; for grading evidence or spotting design flaws use alterlab-scientific-thinking. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.Science★ 78
- alterlab-hypogenicAlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-SkillsRuns automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation and testing on tabular datasets with HypoGeniC, combining literature insights with data-driven testing. Use when systematically exploring hypotheses about patterns in empirical data (for example deception detection or content analysis). For manual hypothesis formulation use alterlab-hypothesis-gen; for open-ended creative ideation use alterlab-scientific-brainstorm. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.Testing★ 78
- alterlab-scientific-thinkingAlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-SkillsEvaluate scientific claims and evidence quality using evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane risk-of-bias tools such as RoB 2 and ROBINS-I), assessing experimental design validity and identifying biases, confounders, statistical pitfalls, and logical fallacies. Use when judging evidence quality, grading certainty of evidence, spotting design or causal-inference flaws, identifying biases or confounders, naming statistical fallacies, or teaching critical analysis. For writing a formal submittable peer review use alterlab-peer-review; for a multi-reviewer mock panel verdict use alterlab-paper-reviewer; for IRB/consent/conflict-of-interest ethics use alterlab-research-ethics. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.Science★ 78
- hypothesis-generationforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsStructured hypothesis formulation from observations. Use when you have experimental observations or data and need to formulate testable hypotheses with predictions, propose mechanisms, and design experiments to test them. Also owns explicit HypoGeniC-style or automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation/testing requests inside this single skill. For open-ended ideation use scientific-brainstorming.Testing★ 3.8K
- hypothesis-gengaasher/Agent-Loop-SkillsUse when the user wants to generate and literature-vet a pool of novel, testable research hypotheses for a question or domain. A multi-agent loop: a Generator proposes candidate hypotheses, a LiteratureScout grounds each in real retrieved literature (already known? closest prior work? what gap does it fill?), and a Judge scores them against a fixed rubric and keeps the strong, non-duplicate ones; rounds repeat — mutating toward the open gaps — until fresh rounds stop adding keepers. Not for sharpening or decomposing a research question (no grounding/scoring there), and not for grading an existing written proposal against the literature.Science★ 177
- alterlab-peer-reviewAlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-SkillsWrites structured, checklist-based single-reviewer reports for manuscripts and grant proposals — assesses methodology, statistical validity, reporting-standards compliance (CONSORT 2025, SPIRIT 2025, STROBE, PRISMA 2020, ARRIVE 2.0), reproducibility, and ethics, and gives constructive, prioritized feedback while respecting reviewer confidentiality and AI-use rules. Use when writing a formal referee report, responding to a journal or grant review invitation, or self-auditing a manuscript against reviewer criteria before submission. For evaluating claims/evidence quality prefer alterlab-scientific-thinking; for a multi-reviewer mock-panel verdict use alterlab-paper-reviewer; for quantitative rubric scoring use alterlab-scholar-eval; to revise a paper in response to reviews use alterlab-paper-writer. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.Engineering★ 78
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in