external-pr-review
From the author
应用外部贡献者 PR review 流程。 收集 PR 信息，编写 mydocs/pr/pr_{N}_review.md，执行验证，编写 pr_{N}_report.md， 并在处理完成时将文档移动到 archives/。只用于外部贡献者 PR，不用于内部 task。
Install
npx skills add postmelee/hyper-waterfall --skill external-pr-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/external-pr-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 78
Security100
Provenance63
Maintenance70
Licence100
Adoption33
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- review-prfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when user asks to "review a PR", "review pull request", "review this pr", "code review this PR", "check PREngineering★ 1.2K
- prd-reviewerTestAny-io/testany-agent-skillsPRD review, 需求评审, 检查 PRD 质量。Use when: PRD 完成后需要评审、"审查 PRD"、"PRD 评审"、"需求评审"。Planning★ 82
- pr-reviewMindrally/skillsFocused pull request review practices with severity-ranked, file-and-line-cited findings across four angles: security, performance, tests, and architecture. Use when asked to review a pull request, review a diff or set of changes, review "this PR," or provide a code review before merge.Engineering★ 286
- patent-reviewwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepGet an external patent examiner review of a patent application. Use when user says "专利审查", "patent review", "审查意见", "examiner review", or wants critical feedback on patent claims and specification.Engineering★ 18K
- pm-prd-reviewkonglong87/superPMUse when: 需要评审 PRD/BRD/MRD 等需求文档的质量、检查完整性/清晰度/可行性/指标/风险/一致性、在开发前做文档把关 Do NOT use when: 文档尚未产出（应先 /pm-docs 生成）；仅需口头讨论无需书面评审Planning★ 83
- peer-reviewyha9806/academic-writing-toolkitReview another author's manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, proposal, or preprint as an external reviewer. Use when asked to evaluate novelty, significance, gap-contribution fit, claim-evidence adequacy, methods, evaluation, overclaim risks, structure, writing, required revisions, or recommendation without rewriting the manuscript or using private author context.Engineering★ 50
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in