llm-judge
From the author
Use when comparing two or more code implementations against a spec or requirements doc. Triggers on "which repo is better", "compare these implementations", "evaluate both solutions", "rank these codebases", or "judge which approach wins". Also covers choosing between competing PRs or vendor submissions solving the same problem. Does NOT review a single codebase for quality — use code review skills instead. Does NOT evaluate strategy docs — use strategy-review. Requires a spec file and 2+ repo paths.
Install
npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill llm-judge -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/llm-judge/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 80
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- mltelagod/code-abyssMachine learning and LLM engineering judgment, distilled from a stronger model - invoke when DECIDING whether/how to use ML or an LLM for a task (prompt vs RAG vs fine-tune vs classical); working with training/eval data or labels; building or reviewing evals for models and LLM features; designing RAG, structured output, or agent pipelines; or diagnosing why a model/LLM feature underperforms. Method-selection ladder, data and leakage discipline, eval-as-spec rules, LLM-era craft, and a trap catalog.Planning★ 243
- review-coderengwu/wayfinder-mapsReview the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating spec/PRD asked for?). Use when the user wants to review a branch, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".Engineering★ 143
- review-specserpro69/claude-toolboxUse after implementing tasks or mid-feature to verify code matches design docs and ensure they are in sync. Detects spec deviations, missing implementations, doc inconsistencies, and outdated docs in design and implementation documentation.Planning★ 152
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsThe pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; with no diff, it reports project health. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Modes, named as the first word: drift for staleness detection, deep for a full documentation audit, closeout to close a finished feature, experience to capture a repeated pattern. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.Engineering★ 1.4K
- code-reviewcbrock84/headcountConducts and responds to code review — reviewing a change for correctness, design, and risk, and evaluating review feedback received on your own work. Use this before merging, when asked to review a diff or pull request, when review feedback has arrived and needs acting on, or when feedback seems wrong and needs a reasoned response rather than compliance.Engineering★ 2.1K
- pm-prd-reviewkonglong87/superPMUse when: 需要评审 PRD/BRD/MRD 等需求文档的质量、检查完整性/清晰度/可行性/指标/风险/一致性、在开发前做文档把关 Do NOT use when: 文档尚未产出（应先 /pm-docs 生成）；仅需口头讨论无需书面评审Planning★ 83
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in