llm-align
From the author
Analyze alignment between LLM judge scores and human labels in an eval dataset. Use this skill whenever someone wants to evaluate how well an LLM judge agrees with human reviewers, calculate TPR/TNR, investigate disagreements, or improve a scorer prompt. Trigger on phrases like: "calculate TPR/TNR", "judge alignment", "where does the LLM disagree with humans", "improve my scorer", "why is the LLM getting these wrong", "compare human labels to LLM scores", "evaluate my eval", or any time someone shares eval results and asks about score quality or judge calibration.
Install
npx skills add Calibre-Labs/reforge-ai-evals --skill llm-align -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/llm-align/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- align-humanagentscope-ai/OpenJudgeUse when the user has a judge/grader and human-labeled data, and wants to measure how well the judge agrees with humans, detect systematic biases, determine whether automatic evaluation can replace human review, or build a human-reduction roadmap. Also use when the user mentions calibration, TPR/TNR, judge validation, inter-rater agreement, Cohen's kappa, bias detection, or "is my automatic evaluation trustworthy." Merges the calibrate and align functions into one skill.Planning★ 888
- alignaiskillstore/marketplaceCreate or review ALIGN.md through a focused conversation about a user's project goals, priorities, preferences, constraints, and decision criteria. Use when the user asks to align expectations, establish project direction, revisit an agreement, or investigate drift from existing alignment. Do not start a new interview for routine work already covered by an agreement.Finance★ 444
- llm-evaluation-designnaodeng/awesome-qa-skillsUse this skill when you need to design LLM evaluation datasets, judges, metrics, and human-review boundaries; triggers include LLM Eval 设计 and llm evaluation design.Design★ 279
- eval-llm-judgeCalibre-Labs/reforge-ai-evalsWrite LLM-as-judge evaluator prompts for AI products. Use this skill whenever you need to evaluate semantic properties of AI outputs that cannot be checked programmatically — output quality, tone, factual accuracy, edge case handling, reference alignment. Also use when auditing existing judge prompts for bias, vagueness, or compound criteria. Output is a judge prompt string and a Python runner function, saved to the project's evaluators file.Writing★ 85
- llm-evaluationwshobson/agentsImplement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.Testing★ 41.7K
- mltelagod/code-abyssMachine learning and LLM engineering judgment, distilled from a stronger model - invoke when DECIDING whether/how to use ML or an LLM for a task (prompt vs RAG vs fine-tune vs classical); working with training/eval data or labels; building or reviewing evals for models and LLM features; designing RAG, structured output, or agent pipelines; or diagnosing why a model/LLM feature underperforms. Method-selection ladder, data and leakage discipline, eval-as-spec rules, LLM-era craft, and a trap catalog.Planning★ 243
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in