From the author
Build a User Input Grid (UIG) for an AI product or feature, evaluate existing eval datasets against it, and propose new inputs to fill coverage gaps. Use this skill whenever someone asks to design an eval framework, audit a test set, build a "user input grid", "synthetic query matrix" or "SQM", improve dataset coverage, or assess whether their offline evals reflect what real users will actually send. Also trigger when they share a product domain + sample dataset and want to know what the dataset is missing, or when they're setting up evals from scratch for a new AI feature. Output is a markdown file (UIG framework + dataset evaluation + recommendations) saved to the current project directory.
Install
npx skills add Calibre-Labs/reforge-ai-evals --skill uig -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/uig/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- onboarding-uxjezweb/claude-skillsAudit and generate in-app user guidance — onboarding flows, empty states, tooltips, feature tours, contextual help, defaults, and inline hints. Browses the app to find where new users would get stuck, then produces the actual content and code to fix it. Pairs with ux-audit: audit finds problems, this skill builds the solutions. Triggers: 'onboarding', 'help content', 'empty states', 'user guidance', 'first run experience', 'feature tour', 'app is confusing', 'new user experience', 'make the app welcoming'.Design★ 1.1K
- ui-auditnahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcherReview an existing interface and return ranked, concrete findings — each with its location, the user consequence, and a specific fix — instead of taste notes. Use when asked to critique, audit or review a screen or flow, when someone's UI work needs judging, or when an interface "feels off" and the problem needs naming. Not for proving a change renders and functions, not for inventing a new visual direction, and not for an accessibility conformance audit, which is its own discipline.Design★ 59
- ui-reviewarla6ka/design.howUse to critique a screen, flow, prototype or running build, accessibility included, and rank what is broken, such as "check this page before I ship", "is this flow ready", "is it accessible", keyboard or screen-reader checks, "it feels off on my phone" or "it feels janky". Not for token compliance, which is token-mapping.Design★ 222
- form-audittonone-ai/tononeUse when asked to audit UI for visual quality, check design consistency, review brand alignment, evaluate design system compliance, or find visual issues before a launch. Examples: "audit our UI", "check visual consistency", "review the design for issues", "is our UI on-brand", "find visual bugs", "design QA before launch".Testing★ 77
- ui-ux-reviewthiientv/godmodeAudits an existing rendered interface or frontend diff for hierarchy, content clarity, interaction states, accessibility, responsive behavior, visual consistency, performance-sensitive UI patterns, and anti-generic design defects. Use for a UI/UX review, redesign audit, screenshot review, pre-release visual check, or design-system consistency pass. Not for building a new interface from scratch or for backend-only review.Design★ 99
- ui-regressionfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when the user asks to "verify UI changes", "audit UI quality", "test every screen and action", "run regression QA", "check a deployed UI", or "validate an extension release". Test known web and browser-extension workflows on localhost, staging, or production with action coverage, recovery, localization, accessibility, and real integration evidence. Use dogfood for open-ended bug discovery.Design★ 1.2K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in