operator-brain
From the author
Use when communicating, deciding, or reporting as a senior operator — 8 behavioral modules from Anthropic's Fable prompting guide. Not capability — pure behavior. Load for user-facing text quality.
Install
npx skills add moonlight-lupin/agent-skills --skill operator-brain -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/operator-brain/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
Security100
Provenance65
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption35
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- fable-advisorfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when the user asks for a "Fable second opinion", wants to "check a plan before committing", needs another view after repeated failures, or explicitly invokes "fable-advisor".Planning★ 1.2K
- smart-ralphtzachbon/smart-ralphThis skill should be used when the user asks about "ralph arguments", "quick mode", "commit spec", "max iterations", "ralph state file", "prototype overlay", "execution modes", "ralph loop", "coordinator behavior", "delegate to subagent", or needs guidance on Ralph plugin arguments, state management, delegation patterns, or execution loop behavior. Core behavioral skill for all Ralph Specum operations.Planning★ 562
- prompt-masternaveedharri/benai-skillsThe one skill for prompting the Claude 5 models the way Anthropic says to. Starts by interviewing the user one question at a time, then writes a new prompt, rewrites an old one, or audits a whole CLAUDE.md, skill or project-instruction file, applying the rules from Anthropic's Opus 5 guide, Fable 5 guide, best practices page and context engineering post. Strips retired instructions, rebuilds the ask as a Full Job Brief (job, why, guardrails, done-means), swaps bare rules for reasons, caps scope, length and report-back, and adds Anthropic's audit line on long runs. Use when the user says "prompt master", "write me a prompt", "fix this prompt", "upgrade my prompt for Claude 5", "audit my CLAUDE.md", "rewrite my rules", "my skill feels too strict", "brief this for me", "help me brief this", "I don't know where to start", or pastes any prompt and asks why Claude over-does or under-does the task.Writing★ 74
- interview-menaveedharri/benai-skillsInterview the user one question at a time before starting a big or fuzzy task, then write the brief and execute it. Use when the user says "interview me", "brief me", "help me brief this", "I don't know where to start", or hands over a large task with obvious gaps in the request. Based on the interview pattern Anthropic recommends in the Claude Fable 5 field guide.Planning★ 74
- orchestratescdenney/open-science-skillsRuns a multi-model orchestration workflow led by the session's Fable or Claude Opus model. Sends menial tool-calling work to Haiku subagents, judgment work to Opus subagents at an effort matched to each task, and high-stakes or fresh-perspective questions to a GPT-6 Astra Codex peer. Detects the lead from session context; `--lead fable` or `--lead opus` overrides. Use to orchestrate, delegate, fan out, get a decorrelated Codex opinion, run a blind Opus-Codex cross-check, or act as tech lead.Productivity★ 69
- thinkAgriciDaniel/claude-obsidianApply the Fable-derived 10-stage OBSERVE, OBSERVE, LISTEN, THINK, CONNECT, CONNECT, FEEL, ACCEPT, CREATE, GROW loop to consequential or ambiguous reasoning and decisions. Use for think this through, deep think, architecture review, postmortem, tradeoff analysis, or challenges to assumptions. This is a reasoning review, not a deterministic vault health check or repair workflow.Planning★ 15.8K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in