national-project-eval
From the author
国家级项目立项逻辑评测技能。对国家级科研/创客项目申报书的立项逻辑、创新点、可行性及研究方案进行系统化评估、评分与逻辑纠错。
Install
npx skills add cuic19053-hue/awesome-student-ai-skills --skill national-project-eval -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/national-project-eval/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 78
Security85
Provenance66
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption37
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- skill-evaluationnaodeng/awesome-qa-skillsUse this skill when designing, running, interpreting, or reporting Agent Skill evaluations, selecting cases or judges, and analyzing trigger, benchmark, or regression evidence; triggers include Skill 评测、评测设计、回归评测。Other★ 293
- acceptance-criteria-reviewnaodeng/awesome-qa-skillsUse this skill when you need to review acceptance criteria for ambiguity, missing rules, and verifiability; triggers include 验收标准评审 and acceptance criteria review.Engineering★ 293
- peer-reviewforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsStructured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.Engineering★ 3.8K
- peer-review-methodologyjaechang-hits/SciAgent-SkillsStructured peer review of manuscripts and grants. 7-stage evaluation: initial assessment, section review, statistical rigor, reproducibility, figure integrity, ethics, writing. Covers CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA and report structure. For evidence quality see scientific-critical-thinking; scoring see scholar-evaluation.Engineering★ 384
- reviewtance-mang/chinese-webnovel-skills中文网文审稿与追读诊断。当用户要审稿、检查剧情漏洞、查伏笔有没有回收、人设是否前后一致、爽点密度够不够、或想知道"读者为什么追读会掉/这章为什么留不住人"时使用。产出数据化诊断报告和可执行的修改建议。Engineering★ 95
- worth-fixluochang212/skill-zoo分析和判断任何论断、报告、想法或需求的真实性、价值与做法。当用户说"这个 bug 是真的吗"、"分析一下这个问题/这个报告/这个说法"、"这个修复值得做吗"、"帮我看下这个建议靠不靠谱"，或用户给出一个待评估的 bug 报告、文章摘录、设计提案时使用。先核验、复现、定级、讲清原理、判断是否值得做，而不是直接相信或直接动手改代码。也适用于评估"要不要重构"。Other★ 124
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in