strict-enforcement
From the author
Use when running claudikins-kernel:verify, checking implementation quality, deciding pass/fail verdicts, or enforcing cross-command gates — requires actual evidence of code working, not just passing tests
Install
npx skills add povvo/claudikins-kernel --skill strict-enforcement -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/strict-enforcement/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 76
Security100
Provenance65
Maintenance50
Licence100
Adoption36
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- testavibebuilder/claude-primeUse when the user wants to know if something works — the answer requires running code, not analyzing it. Output is a verdict backed by evidence: passed, failed, or broken. Primary triggers: 'run the tests', 'does X still work after my change?', 'did the merge break anything?', 'verify the fix worked', 'check if the endpoint returns X', 'confirm nothing regressed', 'run tests/unit/test_foo.py', 'let me know the results', 'make sure my changes didn't break anything'. Hard stops — do NOT use for: reviewing test code for quality/coverage gaps, debugging why test infrastructure/databases/seed scripts are misbehaving, writing or fixing tests, diagnosing root causes of unexpected behavior. The deciding question: is the user asking for the result of executing something, or asking for help understanding/analyzing/improving something? If it's the latter, use diagnose or review-code instead.Testing★ 120
- verify-gatepskoett/pskoett-ai-skillsRuns project compile, test, and lint commands between implementation and quality review. Gates simplify-and-harden behind machine verification. If checks fail, routes back to implementation with diagnostics for a fix loop. If checks pass, signals ready for the quality pass. Use after any implementation work completes and before simplify-and-harden. Essential for the inner loop's verify step.Testing★ 321
- verifycodeaholicguy/ai-devkitAI DevKit · Enforce evidence-based completion claims — require fresh command output before reporting success. Use when completing any task, fixing a bug, finishing a phase, running tests, building, deploying, or making any "it works" claim.Testing★ 1.7K
- verifying-external-behaviorkajisho5/ffmpeg-skillConfirms what a third-party library, remote API, build backend, or scraped document actually does before writing code that depends on it — throwaway probes that run in seconds, permissive clients that forward wrong arguments instead of rejecting them, per-endpoint docs that don't generalize, response shapes that make a "fast path" always-false, fakes that encode your assumption rather than the service's behavior, and dry-runs that skip the step that fails. Use when integrating a new dependency or endpoint, writing a tolerated-status or error branch, choosing a client argument name, testing against a fake, or reviewing code that asserts an upstream contract.Testing★ 2.7K
- tracking-verifyjtrackingai/analytics-tracking-automationUse when the user wants preview QA, failure interpretation, release readiness, or an explicit publish handoff.Testing★ 145
- implementericrisco/rsc-harnessUse when an approved plan and task list exist and it is time to turn them into working, tested code — the SDD phase after `analyze` and before `verify`. Enforces TDD: a failing test comes before the code that makes it pass, one task at a time, appended to a progress ledger that survives compaction. Delegates test tooling to the stack skill and fans disjoint tasks out via `parallel`. NOT spec writing (that is `specify`), NOT planning (that is `plan`), NOT the final lint/test/audit gate (that is `verify`).Testing★ 272
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in