fallow-review
From the author
Review AI-generated or human-written code changes with fallow's graph-grounded review brief. Subtracts deterministic concerns (unused code, complexity, duplication, styling) from the loop, ranks what to look at by blast radius and risk, and surfaces the few consequential structural decisions (new public-API contracts, coupling/boundary crossings, new dependencies) as framed judgment questions anchored to verifiable signals. Drives a closed agent-contract loop: fetch the walkthrough guide, return a judgment, and have fallow post-validate it against the live graph (hallucinated or stale judgments are rejected). Use when asked to review a PR, review a branch, review a diff, do a code review, or check changed code before merge.
Install
npx skills add fallow-rs/fallow-skills --skill fallow-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/fallow-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 84
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- ai-code-reviewmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsReview AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.Engineering★ 1.5K
- slop-codeAgriciDaniel/anti-slopSlop review and repair for source code, tests, configuration, generated documentation, README files, commit messages and pull request descriptions. Use when someone asks to review generated or agent-written code for quality, asks whether a diff is padded or ceremonial, asks about hallucinated or slopsquatted imports, or asks to clean up comments, docstrings, wrapper functions, defensive try/except blocks, or tests that assert nothing. Runs the load-bearing test: delete the comment, wrapper, handler or assertion-free test and name what broke. Runs the package existence scanner over every import. Reviews commit and pull request text for canned policy assurances and preserved-information boilerplate. Reports defects with severity and confidence separated, never an authorship verdict, and never a claim that a diff was machine written.Engineering★ 65
- code-reviewanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsReview code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.OfficialEngineering★ 34K
- architecture-reviewthiientv/godmodeReviews an existing codebase for structural friction, unclear ownership, leaky or shallow interfaces, excessive coupling, misplaced state, poor testability, and risky dependency direction, then prioritizes evidence-backed improvement candidates. Use for architecture audits, modularization, modernization, or recurring cross-cutting change pain. Not for designing one new interface, simplifying a local function, or fixing a reproduced bug.Planning★ 99
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsThe pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; with no diff, it reports project health. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Modes, named as the first word: drift for staleness detection, deep for a full documentation audit, closeout to close a finished feature, experience to capture a repeated pattern. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.Engineering★ 1.5K
- roblox-code-reviewEL4CTEO/roblox-skillsReview Roblox/Luau code for exploits, data loss, memory leaks, performance problems, lifecycle bugs, policy issues, and deprecated or superseded APIs, using a severity-ranked checklist and the full 2026 deprecation map. Use when reviewing a PR or script, auditing a game before launch, modernizing legacy code, or asked what is wrong with some Roblox code.Engineering★ 57
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in