agentic-review
From the author
Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.
Install
npx skills add Ovid/paad --skill agentic-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/agentic-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 84
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- agentic-code-reviewDominikTobureto/awesome-grok-buildUse when reviewing a diff, pull request, branch, or AI-generated code for correctness, security, regression, test, performance, and maintainability risks before merge.Engineering★ 67
- agentic-architectureOvid/paadUse when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and not for reviewing a branch diff.Planning★ 143
- ax-auditOutlineDriven/outline-driven-developmentUse when asked to audit an agent or AI feature for agentic-experience quality (AX review, agent-native critique, trust question). Not for source or remote-system changes.Engineering★ 54
- agentic-evalgithub/awesome-copilotPatterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response qualityTesting★ 40.4K
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsUse before merge, after subagents, or for spec/plan review.Engineering★ 1.4K
- architecture-reviewthiientv/godmodeReviews an existing codebase for structural friction, unclear ownership, leaky or shallow interfaces, excessive coupling, misplaced state, poor testability, and risky dependency direction, then prioritizes evidence-backed improvement candidates. Use for architecture audits, modularization, modernization, or recurring cross-cutting change pain. Not for designing one new interface, simplifying a local function, or fixing a reproduced bug.Planning★ 99
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in