Pair Programming
From the author
Collaboratively design, implement, review, and refine software features with a human developer using an iterative pair programming workflow. Prioritize understanding, explicit approval, small reviewable changes, and synchronized specifications.
Install
npx skills add sivaprasadreddy/sivalabs-agent-skills --skill 'Pair Programming' -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/Pair-Programming/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 84
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- pairingtestdouble/hanBuild work collaboratively in reviewable pieces, handing each piece back for review before starting the next, so the person stays in the lead and steers while the work happens instead of reviewing a finished result. Use when someone says to pair with them on something, asks to collaborate rather than direct, wants to review as it goes, or wants to guide the work piece by piece — on code, on a design decision, or on writing. For a test-first build it runs tdd, for restructuring it runs refactor, for an interface contract it runs design-an-api, and for plan work it runs iterative-plan-review or plan-implementation, each collaboratively; invoke any of those directly instead to run it straight through without pausing. Does not pace someone through code that already exists and builds nothing — use code-walkthrough. Does not explain, summarize, or research something instead of producing it — use code-overview or research.Testing★ 323
- team-uitranhieutt/software_development_departmentOrchestrates the UI team of ux-designer and ui-programmer to design, implement, and polish a UI feature from wireframe to final implementation. Use when a UI component or page needs both design and engineering coordination.Design★ 74
- process-designcbrock84/headcountDesigns, documents, and fixes operational processes — mapping the current state, finding where work actually stalls, redesigning the flow, and building controls that hold. Use this when the same failure keeps recurring, when a handoff between teams is unreliable, when onboarding a repeated task, when work takes far longer than the work itself, or when deciding whether to automate, standardize, or eliminate a process.Design★ 2.1K
- designvladikk/modularityDesigns modular high-level architectures from functional requirements and produces design documents for each module. Use when designing a new system, creating architecture documentation, or producing module-level design specs with integration contracts and test specifications.Design★ 566
- system-designNickCrew/Claude-CortexUse when designing system architecture, APIs, components, or data models - provides a structured design workflow with validation and documentation outputs.Design★ 61
- plan-implementationtestdouble/hanBuilds a feature implementation plan from an existing feature specification (or equivalent context) through a facilitated team conversation. Use when the user wants to plan how to implement, build, deliver, or ship a feature that has already been specified. Does not specify what the feature should do — use plan-a-feature first. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not refine or stress-test an already-written plan — use iterative-plan-review. Runs its resolution rounds to completion and holds its questions until after they finish; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.Planning★ 323
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in