taste-code-review
From the author
Structured review of agent-generated code: a fixed pass order (behavior → structure → taste → security → performance → accessibility), severity-ranked findings, diff discipline, and a review checklist that stops "it works" from being the bar. Use when auditing any generated or changed code. Stack on the design-taste core skill.
Install
npx skills add madebymustafa/design-taste --skill taste-code-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/taste-code-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 82
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- taste-code-craftmadebymustafa/design-tasteCode-level craft for agent-built UI: semantic HTML, token-driven CSS (no hardcoded values), specificity discipline, component hygiene, zero inline styles, no dead code. The engineering half of "designed, not generated" — a beautiful page is betrayed by sloppy markup. Use when generating or auditing any frontend code. Stack on the design-taste core skill.Engineering★ 192
- code-reviewgetsentry/skillsPerform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.OfficialEngineering★ 1.1K
- taste-design-reviewmadebymustafa/design-tasteStructured visual and usability audit of existing interfaces — landing pages, SaaS apps, portfolios. Screenshot-first review against taste rules, Nielsen heuristics, and accessibility floor; severity-ranked findings with specific fixes; before/after verification. Use when asked to critique, review, or improve an existing UI.Design★ 192
- structured-code-reviewrohitg00/skillkitPerforms a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR feedback, pull request review, or wants their code checked for bugs, style issues, or vulnerabilities — triggered by phrases like "review my code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "pull request review", or "code feedback".Engineering★ 1.6K
- review-codetobihagemann/turboReview code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", "check for bugs", "scan for bugs", "review correctness", "security audit", "find vulnerabilities", "review security", "check API usage", "verify against docs", "check for cross-file duplication", "review consistency", "check for code reuse", "review simplicity", "find untested code", "find redundant tests", or "review test coverage".Engineering★ 416
- reviewtechygarg/latticePerform a structured code review by composing validation checklists from relevant atoms based on what code changed. Loads atoms conditionally -- clean-code always, architecture/DDD/security/tests only when the delta touches their domain. Produces a severity-ordered report with specific locations and fixes. Use when the user asks to 'review this', 'code review', 'quality check', 'validate the code', 'check my code', 'review the delta', or 'review this PR'.Engineering★ 208
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in