code-review
From the author
Use to judge a concrete diff, branch, or GitHub PR on its own merits with no rsc-SDD spec/plan chain to key off — the spec-less giving pass behind /code-review: only findings you can defend, one verdict, read-only unless --comment or --fix. NOT the SDD gate keyed to 02-DOCS/wiki/sdd/ that also processes incoming review comments (that is `review`).
Install
npx skills add ericrisco/rsc-harness --skill code-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/code-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 86
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- pr-code-reviewerthiientv/godmodeReviews a GitHub pull request or focused branch diff for correctness, regressions, security, compatibility, test gaps, and maintainability. Use when an implementation needs an independent source-aware review before merge. Produces prioritized findings with evidence and actionable fixes. Not for architecture-only audits, formatting preferences, or processing existing review feedback.Engineering★ 99
- secure-code-reviewnahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcherReview a change or a codebase for security defects with a deliberate reading order — where bugs cluster, trace source to sink, confirm reachability, and write a finding someone can actually fix. Use when asked to security-review a pull request, feature or repository, or before shipping anything touching auth, money, tenancy, uploads or secrets. Not a scanner run (its output is leads), not design-stage threat modeling, and not a penetration test — nothing here authorizes touching a running system.Engineering★ 59
- reviewdzhng/skillsCloseout pass on a finished substantive change — sequence refactor-clean (shape), code-review (diff), and write-docs (docs) so all three run, in the order where each feeds the next. Use after implementing a slice or feature and before calling it done or committing; when the user asks for a final review, a cleanup-and-document pass, or to "review everything." For a diff-only audit, reach code-review directly.Engineering★ 1.4K
- github-review-prfeiskyer/codex-settingsReview a GitHub pull request by number or URL for evidence-backed defects. Not for reviewing local uncommitted changes.Engineering★ 248
- pr-reviewathola/claude-night-marketReviews pull requests with scope validation, requirements compliance, and line comments. Use when reviewing GitHub or GitLab PRs.Engineering★ 343
- receiving-code-reviewjnMetaCode/superpowers-zh收到代码审查反馈后、实施建议之前使用，尤其当反馈不明确或技术上有疑问时——需要技术严谨性和验证，而非敷衍附和或盲目执行Engineering★ 8.4K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in