grants
From the author
Use when pursuing non-dilutive public or foundation funding — money you neither repay nor give equity for: finding a fit call, go/no-go, registration (UEI/PIC/BDNS), or writing the rubric-scored application, logic model, budget justification, or LOI. NOT an equity round (that is `fundraising`), NOT a paying-customer SOW (that is `proposals`).
Install
npx skills add ericrisco/rsc-harness --skill grants -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/grants/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 79
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- fundraisingericrisco/rsc-harnessUse when planning or running an equity round as a process: sizing the raise to a milestone, choosing post-money SAFE vs priced round, tiering investors by intro path, sequencing outreach for momentum, or reading a term sheet before signing. NOT the slide narrative (that is `pitch-deck`), NOT the cap-table or valuation math (that is `financial-model`).Documents★ 255
- proposalsericrisco/rsc-harnessUse when writing the document a buyer reads to say yes — a commercial proposal or Statement of Work, turning discovery notes into a scoped and priced document, adding tiers so the middle one wins, or diagnosing a proposal that will not close. NOT the binding legal agreement with its liability and IP clauses (that is `contracts`), NOT deciding the number or the margin (that is `pricing`), NOT the deck that pitches the vision to a room (that is `pitch-deck`).Documents★ 255
- award-applicationjezweb/claude-skillsWrite compelling award submissions, grant applications, and competition entries. Maps achievements to selection criteria using evidence-based narratives. Use whenever the user is applying for a business award (Telstra, chamber of commerce, industry awards), a grant, a competition, or any submission demonstrating merit against defined criteria.Writing★ 1.1K
- peer-reviewforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsStructured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.Engineering★ 3.8K
- paper-writingbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when drafting, rewriting, reviewing, or auditing prose for any section of an empirical academic paper (Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Data, Results, Discussion, Conclusion) or specialized output (job market paper, grant proposal, policy brief, referee response).Science★ 4.8K
- technical-writingseb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skillsWrite clear, concise, and accurate technical documentation including API references, user guides, tutorials, changelogs, and architecture docs, tailored to the target audience. Use when the user requests technical writing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.Writing★ 228
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in