code-review
From the author
Ревью изменений в текущей ветке относительно main. Используй, когда просят проверить код, сделать ревью, найти проблемы перед PR или коммитом.
Install
npx skills add justxor/claude-code-pro-course --skill code-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/code-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 85
Security100
Provenance70
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption42
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- code-reviewinghuangjia2019/claude-code-engineeringReview code for quality, security, and best practices. Use when the user asks for code review, wants feedback on their code, mentions reviewing changes, or asks about code quality.Engineering★ 1.1K
- reviewdavepoon/buildwithclaudePower-user audit of Origin's pending surfaces. Most users want `/brief` for revisions. That handles the daily flow. Use `/review` only for explicit deep-walk audits after bulk imports, or when you want to walk the full queue rather than the top 3 shown in /brief. Invoked as `/review captures` or `/review revisions`.Engineering★ 3.7K
- requesting-code-reviewjnMetaCode/superpowers-zh完成任务、实现重要功能或合并前使用，用于验证工作成果是否符合要求Engineering★ 8.4K
- review-prfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when user asks to "review a PR", "review pull request", "review this pr", "code review this PR", "check PREngineering★ 1.2K
- receiving-code-reviewjnMetaCode/superpowers-zh收到代码审查反馈后、实施建议之前使用，尤其当反馈不明确或技术上有疑问时——需要技术严谨性和验证，而非敷衍附和或盲目执行Engineering★ 8.4K
- review-codetobihagemann/turboReview code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", "check for bugs", "scan for bugs", "review correctness", "security audit", "find vulnerabilities", "review security", "check API usage", "verify against docs", "check for cross-file duplication", "review consistency", "check for code reuse", "review simplicity", "find untested code", "find redundant tests", or "review test coverage".Engineering★ 417
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in