walkthrough
From the author
Assemble a report-ready walkthrough.md for a SOLVED engagement - populate the Evidence gallery from the poc/ images captured during the engagement, and draft the step-by-step reproduction from state/loot/log (Killchain.md for pentest/bugbounty, state.md's Chain/Status for ctf) without fabricating. Use when asked to "write the walkthrough", "assemble the walkthrough", "close out the box/engagement", or at close-out once an engagement is marked SOLVED.
Install
npx skills add Encod3d-Sec/TORCH --skill walkthrough -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/walkthrough/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- ingestEncod3d-Sec/TORCHSynthesize raw recon/test output into engagement state. Reads everything dropped in targets/<active>/ingest/, extracts hosts/assets/creds/paths, merges into state.md/loot.md/Killchain.md, logs it, archives the raw files. Works for pentest, bugbounty, and ctf. Use when asked to "ingest", "synthesize findings", "process recon", or after dropping tool output in the ingest folder.Security★ 334
- learnEncod3d-Sec/TORCHPost-engagement knowledge harvest AND harness retrospective - after a box/bugbounty/pentest/CTF is completed, first diff how the engagement was EXECUTED against the skills/hooks that governed it (what discipline was skipped) and improve the harness, then sweep the whole engagement for GENERIC reusable knowledge NOT already in wiki/ and land it via the leak-gated stage->promote pipeline. Use at close-out or when asked to "extract learnings", "what did we learn", "harvest lessons into wiki", "distill this engagement", "post-mortem into the wiki", "what did we do wrong", "improve the harness from this box".Security★ 334
- make-traceAIScientists-Dev/FlowtraceTurn any source that describes how a kind of task gets done (a SKILL.md, a chat log, a runbook, plain prose) into a runnable Morph trace. Lift it into a DAG, write a contract per step, place inputs, and drive the full run lifecycle to verify it. Use whenever someone wants to make a trace from a source.Legal★ 484
- engagement-flowhypnguyen1209/offensive-claudeUse when starting, planning, or running a multi-phase pentest or red-team engagement — to sequence the Cyber Kill Chain phases with quality gates instead of jumping straight to exploitationSecurity★ 401
- checkpointpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowSave a structured state snapshot before stopping or handing off. Captures the active plan, recent decisions, file pointers (with line numbers), open questions, and the next 1–3 actions into a checkpoint file under `quality_reports/checkpoints/`. Optionally proposes `[LEARN]` entries to add to MEMORY.md. Use when user says "checkpoint", "save state", "snapshot before I stop", "where am I", "wrap up the session for handoff", or before a long break / model switch / collaborator handoff. Companion to (NOT replacement for) the narrative session-log workflow.Planning★ 1.7K
- code-walkthroughtestdouble/hanWalks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.Engineering★ 322
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in