interpret-feedback
From the author
Interpret third-party feedback by running parallel internal and peer interpretations to surface intent, correctness concerns, and ambiguities. Use when the user asks to "interpret feedback", "interpret comments", "what does this feedback mean", "clarify reviewer intent", "understand this review", or "interpret these suggestions".
Install
npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill interpret-feedback -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/interpret-feedback/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 86
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- receive-feedbackexistential-birds/beagleProcess external code review feedback with technical rigor. Use when receiving feedback from another LLM, human reviewer, or CI tool. Verifies claims before implementing, tracks disposition.Engineering★ 85
- review-responseNoobyGains/godmodeUse when code review feedback arrives from the user, a reviewer subagent, another model, a human colleague or an automated tool, before changing any code in response, and especially when the feedback is unclear, looks wrong, or contains several items that may depend on each other.Engineering★ 115
- review-implementingmhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplaceProcess and implement code review feedback systematically. Use when user provides reviewer comments, PR feedback, code review notes, or asks to implement suggestions from reviews.Engineering★ 689
- peer-reviewK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsPrepares evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Supports authorized review of scientific manuscripts, protocols, preprints, or research proposals; reporting-guideline selection; claim–evidence checks; methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, figure/table, and citation critique; or revision-response planning.Engineering★ 55.1K
- evaluate-findingstobihagemann/turboCritically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to "evaluate findings", "assess review comments", "triage review feedback", "evaluate review output", or "filter false positives".Engineering★ 417
- receiving-critical-reviewK-Dense-AI/science-superpowersUse when receiving critical feedback on an analysis or manuscript, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or methodologically questionable - requires verification, not performative agreement or blind changesEngineering★ 363
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in