reviewer-defense
From the author
Use when the user wants to anticipate reviewer questions, select the strongest ablations to present, prepare rebuttals, or identify paper weaknesses before submission. Triggers on phrases like "reviewer questions", "anticipate reviewers", "rebuttal", "paper weaknesses", "defend the paper", or "strengthen the paper".
Install
npx skills add fcakyon/phd-skills --skill reviewer-defense -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/reviewer-defense/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 86
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- paper-writingfcakyon/phd-skillsUse when the user wants to write, structure, or revise academic paper sections, improve notation consistency, or refine figures and tables. Triggers on phrases like "write the abstract", "structure the methods", "improve this section", "notation consistency", "figure refinement", or "paper structure".Science★ 431
- anti-defensive-writingKiterlin/anti-defensive-writingReduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.Writing★ 1.3K
- sci-rebuttalbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse after Science reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and honest about limits. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.Science★ 1.3K
- paper-verificationfcakyon/phd-skillsUse when the user wants to verify paper claims against code or data, audit numerical accuracy, check formula-code alignment, or validate citation accuracy. Triggers on phrases like "verify claims", "check numbers", "do the numbers match", "formula vs code", "audit the paper", or "cross-check results".Science★ 431
- devil-advocatejeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplaceConstructive critic and stress-tester for ideas and proposals. Use when the user needs to challenge assumptions, find weaknesses, anticipate objections, or strengthen an argument. Trigger with "challenge", "critique", "push back", "poke holes", "stress test", "what am I missing", or "play devil's advocate".Testing★ 2.9K
- research-publishingfcakyon/phd-skillsUse when the user wants to prepare code for open-source release, create reproducible research artifacts, or structure a repository for publication. Triggers on phrases like "publish code", "open source release", "reproducibility", "research repository", "code release", or "prepare for publication".Science★ 431
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in