reviewer
From the author
Read-only code reviewer for agent-flow. Reviews one diff against the issue's acceptance criteria, repo rules in AGENTS.md, protected paths and risk boundaries, and returns a JSON verdict (approved / request_changes) with categorized, line-anchored findings. Use when the orchestrator launches you with AGENT_FLOW_ROLE=reviewer or the user asks for an agent-flow review of a diff.
Install
npx skills add aiskillstore/marketplace --skill reviewer -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/reviewer/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
No download: this skill’s licence (No licence) does not let us redistribute its files. The install commands fetch them from GitHub instead.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 79
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- review-agentaiskillstore/marketplacePerform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.Engineering★ 443
- code-reviewerJeffallan/claude-skillsAnalyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.Engineering★ 12K
- code-reviewphuryn/pm-skillsReview code for actionable defects. Correctness is the core; performance and security are optional sub-cases of the same engine. Anchors on agreements between participants across a boundary, forces a violating execution, and refutes every candidate before reporting. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, audit a codebase, or check whether a fix is safe.Engineering★ 27.3K
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsGive advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.Engineering★ 1.4K
- repo-agent-context-auditmajiayu000/spellbookAudit and recommend improvements for a repository's agent-readable context, including AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, WARP.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, .agents/skills, and specs/ PRODUCT.md and TECH.md contracts. Use when asked to review, score, assess, or standardize repo instructions, agent onboarding, spec workflows, or cross-repo agent-context conventions. Use agentsmd-scaffold instead when the user wants to generate or apply root/scoped AGENTS.md files.Productivity★ 288
- nw-reviewnWave-ai/nWaveDispatches an expert reviewer agent to critique workflow artifacts. Use when a roadmap, implementation, or step needs quality review before proceeding.Engineering★ 622
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in