deep-research-team
From the author
This skill should be used when the user asks for "deep research", "research team", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "investigate thoroughly", "compare X vs Y in depth", or needs synthesis across multiple sources with verification. It spawns a coordinated team of researcher agents across multiple rounds, with the lead triaging findings and creating targeted follow-up tasks. Scales from Focused (2 researchers, 1-2 rounds) to Comprehensive (4 researchers, 3-4 rounds with cross-verification). Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
Install
npx skills add malob/nix-config --skill deep-research-team -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/deep-research-team/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 80
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- deep-researchstaruhub/ClaudeSkillsUse this skill when the user wants an evidence-based research memo, literature review, market/policy/technical landscape, or a multi-source decision brief with citations, trade-offs, and a clear conclusion. Best for tasks that need synthesis across multiple external sources, iterative follow-up research, or a reusable written artifact. Do not use for quick factual lookups, single-source summaries, simple Q&A, summarizing one document the user already provided, plan-only requests where the user explicitly defers the actual research, or when the user wants a short answer with no need for cited evidence (a short but evidence-backed conclusion is still a brief memo, which this skill covers). Chinese trigger examples: "帮我调研", "深度研究", "综述报告", "技术选型分析", "竞品研究", "政策分析".Science★ 732
- super-researchbreakstageaxe61/genspark-clawRun a mixture-of-agents style deep research workflow — decompose a question, fan out parallel searches, cross-verify claims across independent sources, and deliver a fully cited report.Science★ 640
- search-tipsmalob/nix-configThis skill should be used when performing web research beyond a simple single search -- looking into topics, comparing options, investigating questions, finding recommendations, or any task where effective use of Exa, Firecrawl, and Reddit tools matters. Triggers on "research", "look into", "investigate", "compare", "find out about", "search for", "find information", "what do people think about", "what are the best", "look up", or multi-source search tasks. Also invocable explicitly by deep-research team members via the Skill tool.Science★ 463
- sn-deep-researchOpenSenseNova/SenseNova-Skills用于用户请求深度研究、系统性研究、竞品分析、方案对比、趋势分析或事实核查时。**遇到以下任一情况就主动使用本 skill，不要自行搜几条就回答**：①用户出现触发词：深度研究 / 深度调研 / 深入研究 / 全面研究 / 系统研究 / 调研 / 调查 / 尽调 / 行业研究 / 市场研究 / 竞品分析 / 政策研究 / 技术研究 / 趋势研究 / 事实核查 / 写一份研究报告 / 调研报告 / 深度报告 / research / deep research；②请求需要跨多来源取证、多维度对比、交叉验证才能给出可靠结论；③用户要求产出报告、白皮书、行业分析或尽调文档；④话题涉及最新政策/市场/产品/价格/法规，需要系统核查。无核验要求的简单常识问答不使用。模糊或宽泛的"研究/了解一下 X"也优先触发。仅不用于：一句话摘要、已给定单一来源的整理、纯文字润色改写。Science★ 5.9K
- discovery-processdeanpeters/Product-Manager-SkillsRun a full discovery cycle from problem hypothesis to validated solution. Use when a team needs a structured path through framing, interviews, synthesis, and experiments.Planning★ 7.6K
- web-researchbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsSearches multiple web sources, synthesizes findings, and produces cited research reports using delegated subagents. Use when the user asks to research a topic online, search the web, look something up, find current information, compare options, or produce a research report.Science★ 4.7K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in