catch-report
From the author
Report how many problems the two brains found: mutual review (the other model checks the work, from the peer-review records) and self-check (an agent finds its own error in its own conversation, judged by that agent's own model), side by side. Use when the owner asks whether the second agent or the reviews are worth it, or wants the week's review results.
Install
npx skills add sno-ai/sno-station-skills --skill catch-report -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/catch-report/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 81
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- eval-reportagentscope-ai/OpenJudgeUse when the user has run multiple evaluation skills and wants a comprehensive analysis — maturity assessment, cross-skill signals, trends, prioritized actions, and an executive summary. Also use when the user mentions eval health check, evaluation audit, ship readiness, evaluation maturity, or "how good is my evaluation system itself." This is a read-only analysis skill.Productivity★ 887
- concurrency-reporthoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-MonitorReport concurrency and parallelism for a session — how many agents ran in parallel, concurrency-lane utilization, peak parallel width, and serialization bottlenecks (sequential chains that could have run as parallel lanes) — using the Agent Monitor workflow intelligence API. Use when checking whether a multi-agent session used parallelism efficiently.Engineering★ 1.1K
- adjudicate-reviewpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowTurn an incoming set of findings — from an AI reviewer, a referee report, a code review, a linter, or a second model — into verified fixes, without letting a confident misread damage correct work. Every finding is a CANDIDATE until checked against the actual source. Use whenever you receive review comments, audit findings, or a critique you did not write yourself, especially when the reviewer is a model or when the volume is too large to check by feel.Engineering★ 1.7K
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsUse before merge, after subagents, or for spec/plan review.Engineering★ 1.4K
- evaluatesuboss87/FDEOpsEvaluate an AI workflow against representative cases and its permitted actions. Use for model, retrieval or agent evaluation; tests do not grant release authority.Testing★ 948
- win-loss-reviewanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsAnalyze recently closed opportunities to find patterns in what wins and what loses - stage of loss, common objections from transcripts, deal characteristics. Leader-focused. Use when the user asks "win loss review", "why are we losing deals", "what's working", or "analyze closed opps".OfficialEngineering★ 31.9K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in