design-submission-check
From the author
Audit a design-award submission package against the current official rules for a specific award cycle. Check required materials and technical constraints, cross-material facts and claims, rights and disclosure risks, and final submission readiness. Use when a user asks for a pre-submission check, compliance review, missing-material audit, consistency check, or final go/no-go decision. Do not use this skill to choose an award, retrieve winners, judge the design itself, rewrite the whole entry, or give a legal clearance opinion.
Install
npx skills add SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills --skill design-submission-check -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/design-submission-check/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 79
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- robustness-checksbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when a main specification has produced a result, when preparing a paper appendix, when a reviewer requests robustness, or before declaring any empirical finding final. Guides selection of design-appropriate checks without mandating a fixed checklist.Design★ 4.7K
- design-evaluationSeanJ1ang/design-judge-skillsEvaluate one design or a user-approved maturity-mapped batch through a transparent evidence-based rubric. Classify each work, score design quality and presentation, identify Critical risks, report evidence confidence, and optionally shortlist works within separate maturity tracks. Use when a user asks to judge, score, critique, review, diagnose, batch-evaluate, or rank designs by evidence-aligned evaluation score. Do not use this skill to retrieve winners, choose an award, produce a redesign, audit submission-file compliance, simulate an official jury, or predict winning probability.Design★ 712
- design-systemanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsAudit, document, or extend your design system. Use when checking for naming inconsistencies or hardcoded values across components, writing documentation for a component's variants, states, and accessibility notes, or designing a new pattern that fits the existing system.OfficialDesign★ 31.9K
- design-award-matchSeanJ1ang/design-judge-skillsMatch a design project to supported design-award programs, tracks, and entry categories; apply structural eligibility gates; verify current official rules; compare published criteria and cautiously described winner trends; and output fit, evidence confidence, and submission priority. Use when a user asks which award or category to enter, compares awards, or requests an award-fit analysis. Supports iF, iF Student, Red Dot Product, Red Dot Design Concept, IDEA, DIA, K-Design, GOOD DESIGN AWARD Japan, Core77, James Dyson, and EPDA. Do not use for winner retrieval alone, detailed submission-file compliance, general design evaluation, optimization, or winning-probability prediction.Design★ 712
- design-award-pipelineSeanJ1ang/design-judge-skillsRoute and coordinate an end-to-end design-award workflow across winner research, evidence-based evaluation, award matching, entry-text preparation, and final submission checking. Use when a user asks for a complete award plan, does not know which Design Judge skill to use, wants multiple stages coordinated, or needs a resumable workflow with explicit handoffs. Do not replace the specialist skills, invent project facts, treat scores as winning probabilities, or bypass current official-rule verification.Design★ 712
- compliance-checkanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsRun a compliance check on a proposed action, product feature, or business initiative, surfacing applicable regulations, required approvals, and risk areas. Use when launching a feature that touches personal data, when marketing or product proposes something with regulatory implications, or when you need to know which approvals and jurisdictional requirements apply before proceeding.OfficialLegal★ 31.9K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in