decision-ownership-audit-ignacio-adrian-lerer
From the author
Audits AI-assisted legal, compliance, governance, and institutional decisions before reliance to determine whether the responsible human or institution has enough access to the evidence, reasoning basis, uncertainty, authority, and review path to genuinely own the decision rather than merely approve, sign, or transmit it.
Install
npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill decision-ownership-audit-ignacio-adrian-lerer -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/decision-ownership-audit-ignacio-adrian-lerer/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
No download: this skill’s licence (AGPL-3.0) does not let us redistribute its files. The install commands fetch them from GitHub instead.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 85
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- legal-transition-audit-ignacio-adrian-lererlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skillsAudits the transition from legal AI output to reliance, recommendation, execution, or real-world commitment. Use it before an AI-generated analysis, memo, contract review, compliance finding, or workflow output is acted upon to check whether authority, evidence, mandate, uncertainty, procedure, and review conditions remain sufficient.Legal★ 888
- lawve-agentic-delegation-audit-ignacio-adrian-lererlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skillsUse when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to accounts, use tools, or rely on external data. Produces a practical delegation, oversight, accountability, and control audit for legal operations.Legal★ 888
- epistemic-fault-line-audit-ignacio-adrian-lererlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skillsAudits legal AI outputs, prompts, skills, workflows and MCP/tool instructions for fluent but unsupported reasoning, missing evidence, overconfidence, hidden assumptions, weak causal links and absent human-review gates.Legal★ 888
- ai-governance-reviewer-carl-ditzlerlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skillsUse this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a preliminary or final governance review with scorecards, findings, owners, remediation actions, and follow-up questions.Legal★ 888
- legal-mdl-audit-ignacio-adrian-lererlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skillsAudits legal AI outputs and workflows for honest compression: unnecessary complexity, false simplicity, excessive caveats, hidden uncertainty and poor cost per legally acceptable output.Legal★ 888
- law-expertise-to-skill-ignacio-adrian-lererlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skillsTurn a lawyer's bounded expertise, workflow, review standard, or legal judgment pattern into a safe, inspectable legal AI skill. Use when a user provides legal memos, comments, checklists, negotiation notes, review habits, compliance playbooks, or professional feedback and wants a reusable Lawve-style skill. Do not impersonate the lawyer or claim to reproduce a person; distill only authorized, source-bounded capability.Legal★ 888
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in