privilege-sentinel
From the author
Pre-flight privilege and work-product check for legal AI prompts. Use when the user is about to send legal content to a third-party AI surface (ChatGPT, Claude.ai, Copilot, Gemini, etc.) and wants to know whether the prompt risks blowing attorney-client privilege or work-product protection. Returns a SAFE/CAUTION/STOP band with cited factors, a discovery-impact line, and a redacted-safe rewrite.
Install
npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill privilege-sentinel -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/privilege-sentinel/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
No download: this skill’s licence (Custom or unclear) does not let us redistribute its files. The install commands fetch them from GitHub instead.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 82
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- skill-injection-defenselawve-ai/awesome-legal-skillsAudits legal AI skills, prompts, workflows, MCP/tool instructions, and agent packages for prompt injection, malicious instructions, unsafe scripts, suspicious metadata, credential exposure, exfiltration paths, persistence mechanisms, and supply-chain risk. Use before installing, importing, publishing, promoting, modifying, or trusting third-party or generated AI skills and legal workflows. Do not use as a generic code review unless skill trust, workflow safety, prompt injection, or supply-chain hygiene is in scope.Legal★ 888
- public-legal-ai-endpoint-protectionlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skillsReviews public or shared AI-backed web endpoints for abuse, excessive cost, data exposure, unsafe browser control, weak request limits, and missing human approval. Use before launching or materially changing an HTTP or API endpoint that can invoke an AI model. Do not use as a penetration test, compliance certification, or substitute for runtime monitoring and professional security review.Legal★ 888
- ai-securityborghei/Claude-SkillsThis skill should be used when the user asks to "scan AI systems for security threats", "check for prompt injection vulnerabilities", "assess model security posture", "detect data poisoning risks", or "audit AI/ML pipeline security".Security★ 962
- security-reviewcodeaholicguy/ai-devkitAI DevKit · Review code, skills, and prompts for security vulnerabilities — OWASP Top 10, prompt injection, business logic flaws, and insecure defaults. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing modules, reviewing AI skills/prompts, or preparing for release.Security★ 1.7K
- ai-productcoco-research/cocoUse when building AI features into a product: LLM integration, RAG pipelines, guardrails, streaming, AI UX, prompt engineering, or AI cost control. Treats prompts as code and validates every model output.Design★ 911
- ai-usage-policymohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrite an AI usage policy people can actually follow — approved tools, data rules, disclosure duties, and review obligations, in one page instead of legal fog. Use when asked for a company AI policy, acceptable-use rules for ChatGPT/Claude/Copilot at work, guidance on what data may go into AI tools, or to fix a policy nobody reads. Produces a one-page usable policy plus the decision log behind it. Not a substitute for legal advice; pairs with compliance-checklist for regulatory mapping and ai-ethics-review for system-level assessments.Legal★ 1.5K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in