replay-user-flows
From the author
Turn a user journey you just clicked through into a saved regression check that re-runs deterministically, with no model in the loop and no test code to write. Use when you have driven the same flow twice, when the user wants regression coverage without a Playwright suite, when a refactor needs proving against every existing journey, or when re-verifying by hand is costing a full drive every time.
Install
npx skills add reticlehq/reticle --skill replay-user-flows -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/replay-user-flows/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 88
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- regression-testingnahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcherTurn a fixed bug into a test that fails on the old code and passes on the new one. Assert behavior at the cheapest useful level and compare old behavior without reverting unrelated work or leaving scratch files. Use after a fix or when recurring defects lack coverage; not for a new feature's test strategy or an environmental/cosmetic failure.Testing★ 59
- replica-testJakeschincariol/replica-skillClicks through every flow of an app clone and tests it for bugs: a test plan generated from the recon flows with happy paths and edge cases, Playwright end-to-end tests where possible, a browser click-through where not, and bug reports in a fixed format with severity, steps and evidence. Use when the user says "test my clone", "find bugs", "QA this", "click through everything", "write e2e tests", "does it work", or after /replica-build or /replica-backend.Testing★ 6.6K
- test-driven-developmentaddyosmani/agent-skillsDrives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality. Use when asked to add tests to a function, fix a bug in it or change its behavior, even when the code is pasted inline and the request does not mention tests.Testing★ 111.9K
- rethinkOvid/paadUse when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for generating alternatives, and not for critiquing a spec, which is /pushback.Planning★ 147
- refactorhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsRestructure or clean up code with no behavior change, proved by before-and-after checks. Use when: asked to clean up, extract, dedupe or simplify, even one function.Engineering★ 1.5K
- agent-evalsnahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcherBuild an eval suite that can actually detect a regression — cases pulled from real traffic, graders that check properties rather than vibes, a recorded baseline, and per-case diffs in both directions. Use before claiming a prompt, model or agent change is an improvement, when agent behaviour must not regress, or when someone reports "it seems better" after eyeballing a handful of outputs. Not for tracing what one run did (llm-observability), not for testing deterministic code, and never as evidence that behaviour the suite does not measure is safe.Testing★ 59
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in