qa-quarto
From the author
Adversarial Quarto-vs-Beamer parity QA. A critic agent compares the Quarto HTML render to the Beamer PDF benchmark for content/visual parity; a fixer agent applies fixes; loops until APPROVED or two consecutive rounds turn up nothing new (fallback cap 5 rounds). Use when user says "qa the quarto", "check parity", "does the html match the pdf?", "quarto matches beamer?", or after a translate-to-quarto run. Requires both the `.qmd` rendered and a `.pdf` benchmark.
Install
npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill qa-quarto -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/qa-quarto/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 89
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- visual-auditpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowAdversarial visual-layout audit of a Quarto `.qmd` or Beamer `.tex` deck. Flags overflow, font inconsistency, box fatigue, spacing, and alignment issues. Use when user says "visual audit", "check the layout", "does this overflow?", "look for visual issues", "audit the slides", or after reworking a deck's appearance. Does NOT check writing or pedagogy — pair with `/proofread` or `/pedagogy-review`.Documents★ 1.7K
- translate-to-quartopedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowA ready-to-fork Claude Code template for academics using LaTeX/Beamer + R. Multi-agent review, quality gates, adversarial QA, and replication protocols.Testing★ 1.7K
- competitorscoreyhaines31/marketingskillsWhen the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.Marketing★ 55.8K
- differential-auditpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowCompare two implementations of the same thing — a port (R↔Python↔Stata), a reimplementation, a replication package, a refactor, or a new version against the old — so that agreement means something. Freeze inputs first, inventory every expected output, test the comparator itself, compare every channel (not just the headline number), and give each divergence a stable ID and a smallest witness. Use for cross-language parity, replication, upgrade/regression gates, or whenever "the numbers match" is about to license a claim.Testing★ 1.7K
- conversion-signal-qaaaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skillsUse when the user asks to "QA my conversion tracking before launch", "check my UTMs / pixel / event firing", "set up a tracking pre-flight", or "set the dedup rule so Meta and Google stop double-counting"; builds and fixes the measurement plumbing — conversion-event firing, UTM hygiene, cross-platform dedup rules, attribution-window alignment, and offline/iOS-ATT modeled-gap flags — as a pre-flight checklist plus a UTM/event-spec builder. Not for scoring R1/R2 — that is a scored veto in ad-account-auditor; not for account structure — use campaign-architect. 付费广告转化追踪QA/UTM规范/跨平台去重Testing★ 3K
- a11y-auditplugin87/ux-ui-agent-skillsAudit a UI or design against WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA and ARIA patterns, returning criterion-referenced findings with severity and specific fixes. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, contrast verification, keyboard/screen-reader review, or wants to confirm a component meets POUR.Design★ 2.6K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in