critique
From the author
Adversarial design critique of the current work — render it, look at it, and argue for rejection. Run after the gates are green, never instead of them.
Install
npx skills add plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills --skill critique -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/critique/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 89
Security100
Provenance81
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption55
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- critique-theaternexu-io/open-designFive-dimension design quality review — score the artifact against craft, brand, accessibility, and copy, then fix what falls short before handing it over.Design★ 102.9K
- solution-architecturecbrock84/headcountDesigns system structure and makes architectural decisions defensible — boundaries, coupling, trade-offs, and recording why. Use this to design a new system or major component, choose between architectural options, review an existing design, decide where a boundary belongs, or document an architectural decision so it survives the people who made it.Planning★ 2.1K
- code-reviewphuryn/pm-skillsReview code for actionable defects. Correctness is the core; performance and security are optional sub-cases of the same engine. Anchors on agreements between participants across a boundary, forces a violating execution, and refutes every candidate before reporting. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, audit a codebase, or check whether a fix is safe.Engineering★ 27.3K
- review-a-designinkeep/open-knowledgeReviews whether a design is SOUND — solving the right problem, derived from its stated goals and constraints — and emits ranked, evidence-backed findings, not edits. Read when asked to 'review this design', 'is this design sound', 'pressure-test this proposal', 'do a design review', 'does this solve the right problem', 'poke holes in this spec', 'should we build this', or to critique a proposal / spec / ADR / architecture or product decision. Do NOT read when the user wants to AUTHOR one of these — routing a new proposal is frame-a-proposal, a spec is write-a-spec, a decision record is record-a-decision, a postmortem is write-a-postmortem. Do NOT read for code review of a diff, or to fact-check individual claims (that is a correctness pass, a different job).Design★ 4.6K
- design-critiqueanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsGet structured design feedback on usability, hierarchy, and consistency. Trigger with "review this design", "critique this mockup", "what do you think of this screen?", or when sharing a Figma link or screenshot for feedback at any stage from exploration to final polish.OfficialDesign★ 31K
- process-designcbrock84/headcountDesigns, documents, and fixes operational processes — mapping the current state, finding where work actually stalls, redesigning the flow, and building controls that hold. Use this when the same failure keeps recurring, when a handoff between teams is unreliable, when onboarding a repeated task, when work takes far longer than the work itself, or when deciding whether to automate, standardize, or eliminate a process.Design★ 2.1K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in