From the author
Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.
Install
npx skills add michael-denyer/pstack-claude --skill tdd -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/tdd/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 90
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- tdd-guideforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsTest-first development route for TDD, writing failing tests first, RED -> GREEN -> REFACTOR, and behavior-changing feature/bug/refactor work. Do not use for already-failing test root-cause debugging, test-report packaging, or final completion evidence.Testing★ 3.7K
- test-driven-devzebbern/claude-code-guideTest-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.Testing★ 4.7K
- doubt-driven-developmentaddyosmani/agent-skillsSubjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production auth, security-sensitive logic, a high-stakes migration, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.Security★ 109.1K
- test-driven-developmentaddyosmani/agent-skillsDrives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality. Use when asked to add tests to a function, fix a bug in it or change its behavior, even when the code is pasted inline and the request does not mention tests.Testing★ 109.1K
- test-gap-auditgithub/awesome-copilotRun a read-only audit for missing, weak, stale, or mis-scoped test coverage. If the user does not name a scope, audit the full repository and identify important code paths, routes, features, services, workflows, and contracts that lack proper tests. If the user names a feature, PR, branch, route, workflow, service, bug fix, API, security-sensitive path, or risky code change, focus only on that specific scope. Use when the user asks what tests are missing, whether coverage is enough, what regression tests to add, or how to prove a change is safe. This is not a general bug audit and not a security review; it evaluates whether behavior is covered by tests.Testing★ 40.3K
- deepchat-sddThinkInAIXYZ/deepchatUse before substantial DeepChat code, configuration, documentation, test, build, feature, issue, refactor, or architecture changes that need a durable RFC and an explicit execution path. Skip trivial style fixes, small localized logic changes, routine docs edits, and simple bugs unless the developer asks for SDD. Use plan.md as the only separate tracker when needed, default to implementation-first validation, and ask before optional GitHub issue sync unless the developer explicitly requested sync.Testing★ 6.4K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in