review-and-refactor
From the author
Review and refactor code in your project according to defined instructions
Install
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill review-and-refactor -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/review-and-refactor/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 95
Security100
Provenance95
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption71
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- refactorgithub/awesome-copilotSurgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.Engineering★ 40.3K
- code-reviewanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsReview code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.OfficialEngineering★ 31K
- requesting-code-reviewjnMetaCode/superpowers-zh完成任务、实现重要功能或合并前使用，用于验证工作成果是否符合要求Engineering★ 8.4K
- build-and-releasethedotmack/claude-memFully automate building and releasing a coding task.Engineering★ 102.1K
- receiving-code-reviewjnMetaCode/superpowers-zh收到代码审查反馈后、实施建议之前使用，尤其当反馈不明确或技术上有疑问时——需要技术严谨性和验证，而非敷衍附和或盲目执行Engineering★ 8.4K
- review-teammvschwarz/openrigUse when assigned a review or when an authored review boundary is reached.Engineering★ 8K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in