ai-debt-detector
From the author
Use after generating code, after accepting AI suggestions, or when reviewing AI-written modules. Also use when code works but feels brittle, when error handling seems thin, when orphaned resources or missing cleanup are suspected, or when the agent claims done but hidden debt may exist. Catches the specific failure patterns AI agents produce that humans would not.
Install
npx skills add wshobson/agents --skill ai-debt-detector -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/ai-debt-detector/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 95
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- checkdavepoon/buildwithclaudeRun CIAgent regression checks after changing an AI agent's code, prompts, or knowledge base in a repo that has agentci_spec.yaml, and interpret the results. Use after editing agent logic, before committing agent changes, or when the user asks whether the agent still works.Writing★ 3.7K
- tech-debtanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsIdentify, categorize, and prioritize technical debt. Trigger with "tech debt", "technical debt audit", "what should we refactor", "code health", or when the user asks about code quality, refactoring priorities, or maintenance backlog.OfficialEngineering★ 31K
- agentic-evalgithub/awesome-copilotPatterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response qualityTesting★ 40.3K
- agent-architecturegithub/awesome-copilotDesign AI agent architectures through requirements discovery, or audit and diagnose architectural flaws in existing agents. Architecture only; excludes implementation and general code review.Planning★ 40.3K
- self-evalalirezarezvani/claude-skillsHonestly evaluate AI work quality using a two-axis scoring system. Use after completing a task, code review, or work session to get an unbiased assessment. Detects score inflation, forces devil's advocate reasoning, and persists scores across sessions.Engineering★ 28.5K
- diagnosing-superpowersjnMetaCode/superpowers-zh当一次 superpowers 会话出了问题、你的人类伙伴想知道原因时使用——重复劳动、无视计划、磕磕绊绊、结果质量差、某个技能没触发、"太慢了"、"为什么这么贵"、"它到底在干什么"——或者想给 superpowers 维护者整理一份 bug 报告;适用于当前会话,或按 id / 路径指定的过往会话,任何工具均可Other★ 8.4K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in