Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research identifies a fundamental linearity within Transformer architectures, proving they can mathematically superpose distinct text streams rather than just processing them sequentially. By restoring this property through fine-tuning and using guided decoding, the study enables a single model pass to generate two coherent continuations simultaneously, challenging the assumption that LLMs are purely non-linear systems.
Sources coveringarXiv, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Your Transformer Can Hold Two Thoughts at Once: Evidence of Linear Superposition in LLMs

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.29845v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on highly non-linear components, in this work we demonstrate that they exhibit fundamental linearity: when inputs from distinct text streams are linearly combined, the model outputs a superposition of the individual next-token distributions. We term this the \textit{Superposition Linearity Hypothesis}. We provide evidence that superposition is an intrinsic property of the Transformer architecture rather than an emergent consequence of training; in fact, we observe that it tends to diminish as pretraining progresses. However, we demonstrate that linearity can be substantially restored through lightweight fine-tuning, significantly reducing the divergence between the predicted next-token distribution and the average of the individual next-token distributions. Finally, we introduce a guided decoding procedure that disentangles superposed outputs, enabling the simultaneous generation of two coherent continuations from a single forward pass.

Abstract:While Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on highly non-linear components, in this work we demonstrate that they exhibit fundamental linearity: when inputs from distinct text streams are linearly combined, the model outputs a superposition of the individual next-token distributions. We term this the \textit{Superposition Linearity Hypothesis}. We provide evidence that superposition is an intrinsic property of the Transformer architecture rather than an emergent consequence of training; in fact, we observe that it tends to diminish as pretraining progresses. However, we demonstrate that linearity can be substantially restored through lightweight fine-tuning, significantly reducing the divergence between the predicted next-token distribution and the average of the individual next-token distributions. Finally, we introduce a guided decoding procedure that disentangles superposed outputs, enabling the simultaneous generation of two coherent continuations from a single forward pass.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.29845 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.29845v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29845 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 229 words

Related coverage