aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces CoRG, a new benchmark evaluating agentic systems' ability to resolve indirect references in collaborative developer conversations using external tools. The RepoRef dataset demonstrates that current agents struggle significantly with multi-step verification tasks, achieving only a 67% success rate even on complex GitHub-based scenarios. This work highlights critical gaps in how AI agents integrate lexical cues with real-time workspace data to ground conversation accurately.
You Know What I Mean: A Benchmark for Agentic Conversational Reference Grounding
arXiv:2608.29834v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Collaborative conversations frequently contain references whose targets are indirect rather than named: resolving "this looks like the fix discussed yesterday" requires combining conversational context with evidence from the surrounding workspace which is accessible through APIs or user interfaces. We formalize this problem as Conversational Reference Grounding (CoRG): using a given set of tools to resolve a reference in conversation to the unique external item intended by the speaker. CoRG is challenging because it combines lexical, semantic, and temporal cues distributed across the conversation and the external workspace. Agents must translate these heterogeneous signals into effective tool use: formulating strategies, discovering plausible candidates, inspecting their metadata and content, and ruling out close alternatives. We study CoRG through RepoRef, a benchmark of 400 developer-chat segments grounded in GitHub issues, pull requests, and commits across 92 repositories. Unlike single-shot retrieval tasks, RepoRef often requires multi-step tool use. Our results show that CoRG remains challenging for current agents, even the best agent reaches only 67.0% success rate, leaving one third of references unresolved. These findings position CoRG as a concrete benchmark for studying how agents search, inspect, and verify information in realistic multi-tool environments.
Abstract:Collaborative conversations frequently contain references whose targets are indirect rather than named: resolving "this looks like the fix discussed yesterday" requires combining conversational context with evidence from the surrounding workspace which is accessible through APIs or user interfaces. We formalize this problem as Conversational Reference Grounding (CoRG): using a given set of tools to resolve a reference in conversation to the unique external item intended by the speaker. CoRG is challenging because it combines lexical, semantic, and temporal cues distributed across the conversation and the external workspace. Agents must translate these heterogeneous signals into effective tool use: formulating strategies, discovering plausible candidates, inspecting their metadata and content, and ruling out close alternatives. We study CoRG through RepoRef, a benchmark of 400 developer-chat segments grounded in GitHub issues, pull requests, and commits across 92 repositories. Unlike single-shot retrieval tasks, RepoRef often requires multi-step tool use. Our results show that CoRG remains challenging for current agents, even the best agent reaches only 67.0% success rate, leaving one third of references unresolved. These findings position CoRG as a concrete benchmark for studying how agents search, inspect, and verify information in realistic multi-tool environments.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
arXiv:2608.29834 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.29834v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29834 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 288 words
Related coverage

Presentation: From AI Agent Demo to Production: Automated Testing and Evaluation
InfoQ · Sep 7, 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · Oct 2, 2026