aiqbench analysis
This arXiv preprint proposes a training-free method that uses a vision-language model once, on a single practice scene, to generate frozen perception and planning programs that solve new instances without further model calls. The reported 99.3% average success across fifteen domain variants is a notable gain over the cited baselines, but it comes from the authors' own benchmarks and has not been independently replicated. For readers tracking the cost of agentic AI, the main question is whether the one-time program generation holds up on less controlled domains.
Write Once, Plan Many: Building Reusable Visual Planning Systems from One Scene
arXiv:2610.19234v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) can reason about visual planning tasks, but querying them for every instance incurs repeated inference cost and latency. Generating reusable planning programs offers an alternative, but constructing reliable planning systems for new problem domains without extensive supervision remains challenging. We present a training-free framework that constructs reusable perception and planning programs from a domain specification and a single practice scene without a paired solution. The central challenge is obtaining useful feedback from the limited input. Our framework addresses it by leveraging VLM's ability to provide a renderer and a dynamic model based on its scene understanding. Rendering detected states enables comparison with the practice scene, while checking simulated action outcomes against the domain specification helps expose errors in rule implementation. Together, these checks guide refinement of the grounding program and planner without requiring solution labels. After refinement and component selection, the programs are frozen and solve new instances without further VLM calls. The same framework constructs systems across domains without manual pipeline redesign. Across fifteen domain variants spanning 2D and 3D scenes with discrete and continuous state, our systems achieve 99.3% average planning success, compared with 80.9% for the strongest domain-level program-generation baseline and 90.7% for the strongest instance-level baseline. Cost analyses show a favorable success-cost trade-off, and ablations confirm the contributions of the executable domain model, execution feedback, and component selection.
Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) can reason about visual planning tasks, but querying them for every instance incurs repeated inference cost and latency. Generating reusable planning programs offers an alternative, but constructing reliable planning systems for new problem domains without extensive supervision remains challenging. We present a training-free framework that constructs reusable perception and planning programs from a domain specification and a single practice scene without a paired solution. The central challenge is obtaining useful feedback from the limited input. Our framework addresses it by leveraging VLM's ability to provide a renderer and a dynamic model based on its scene understanding. Rendering detected states enables comparison with the practice scene, while checking simulated action outcomes against the domain specification helps expose errors in rule implementation. Together, these checks guide refinement of the grounding program and planner without requiring solution labels. After refinement and component selection, the programs are frozen and solve new instances without further VLM calls. The same framework constructs systems across domains without manual pipeline redesign. Across fifteen domain variants spanning 2D and 3D scenes with discrete and continuous state, our systems achieve 99.3% average planning success, compared with 80.9% for the strongest domain-level program-generation baseline and 90.7% for the strongest instance-level baseline. Cost analyses show a favorable success-cost trade-off, and ablations confirm the contributions of the executable domain model, execution feedback, and component selection.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.19234 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.19234v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19234 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 319 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026

Top AI Coding Agents and Development Platforms in 2026: Atoms, Devin, Windsurf, Cursor, Warp, and More Compared
MarkTechPost · Jun 10, 2026