aiqbench analysis
This study examines the organizational friction arising as enterprise AI shifts from reactive tools to proactive "teammates" embedded within human workflows. By analyzing micro-negotiations between humans and persistent agents, the research highlights critical challenges in maintaining trust, agency, and tacit collaborative rules in a shared workplace environment. These findings provide essential signals for designing future AI systems that actively preserve human oversight rather than merely automating tasks.
Working with Agentic `Teammates': When a New Organizational Actor Collides with the Human Ecosystem of Work
arXiv:2609.29901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enterprise AI is transitioning from single-user, reactive tools toward proactive, multi-user 'teammates,' but our empirical understanding of this transition is limited. In this paper, we present an in-situ qualitative study of a persistent, proactive AI agent 'teammate' deployed across multiple teams in a large technology company. Our findings reveal the boundaries of the human-agent workplace are actively in flux, triggering breakdowns and negotiations across: 1) tacit rules of collaborative human workflows, 2) the relational boundaries of this new non-human actor, and 3) the redistribution of trust and human agency. We use these early micro-negotiations as signals to chart a new research, design, and organizational agenda that intentionally preserves human agency in a workplace shared with non-human organizational actors.
Abstract:Enterprise AI is transitioning from single-user, reactive tools toward proactive, multi-user 'teammates,' but our empirical understanding of this transition is limited. In this paper, we present an in-situ qualitative study of a persistent, proactive AI agent 'teammate' deployed across multiple teams in a large technology company. Our findings reveal the boundaries of the human-agent workplace are actively in flux, triggering breakdowns and negotiations across: 1) tacit rules of collaborative human workflows, 2) the relational boundaries of this new non-human actor, and 3) the redistribution of trust and human agency. We use these early micro-negotiations as signals to chart a new research, design, and organizational agenda that intentionally preserves human agency in a workplace shared with non-human organizational actors.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.29901 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2609.29901v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29901 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 215 words
Related coverage
Amazon is investing in the Lean Focused Research Organization
Amazon Science · Jul 26, 2026

34 Amazon Research Awards Build on Trainium recipients announced
Amazon Science · Aug 5, 2026

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · May 27, 2026
Process Constitutions and Process Stewards: Towards the Next Generation of BPM for Agentic Organizations
arXiv · Oct 7, 2026