aiqbench analysis
WOMBAT establishes a critical benchmark for Graph Neural Networks by using hand-crafted models with known decision rules to expose failures in post-hoc explainers like Integrated Gradients. This dataset allows researchers to distinguish between genuine model shortcuts and explainer errors, directly advancing the reliability of XAI tools in molecular property prediction. By releasing these specific counter-examples, the work provides essential ground truth for developing more robust attribution methods in chemical AI.
WOMBAT: Whitebox Oracle for Molecular Benchmarking and Attribution Testing
arXiv:2610.00713v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When a graph neural network (GNN) explainer produces an unexpected attribution on a molecule, the attribution alone cannot reveal whether the explainer has failed or the model has learned a shortcut. We introduce WOMBAT, a benchmark of 14 whitebox GNNs, each with message-passing weights set by hand to detect a specific SMARTS motif. Each model's decision rule is known by construction, providing attribution ground truth against which explainer errors can be identified and studied. We validate the models on millions of PubChem molecules and evaluate post-hoc explainers including GNNExplainer, PGExplainer, and Integrated Gradients. Guided by our qualitative analysis, we construct a model that causes Integrated Gradients to spread attribution across the graph, even though the model reliably detects the intended motif. We release the dataset, models, and evaluation code to help researchers in the development of newer XAI tools for GNNs.
Abstract:When a graph neural network (GNN) explainer produces an unexpected attribution on a molecule, the attribution alone cannot reveal whether the explainer has failed or the model has learned a shortcut. We introduce WOMBAT, a benchmark of 14 whitebox GNNs, each with message-passing weights set by hand to detect a specific SMARTS motif. Each model's decision rule is known by construction, providing attribution ground truth against which explainer errors can be identified and studied. We validate the models on millions of PubChem molecules and evaluate post-hoc explainers including GNNExplainer, PGExplainer, and Integrated Gradients. Guided by our qualitative analysis, we construct a model that causes Integrated Gradients to spread attribution across the graph, even though the model reliably detects the intended motif. We release the dataset, models, and evaluation code to help researchers in the development of newer XAI tools for GNNs.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.00713 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.00713v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00713 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 235 words
Related coverage
PMO-Dock: Benchmarking Docking, Specificity, and Generalization in Molecular Optimization
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026
Article: Your Next DSL Author is a Language Model
InfoQ · Sep 16, 2026
[AINews] Modal’s $1B ARR, $16B Series D makes it NYC’s newest AI Infra Decacorn, 3x usage and 3x valuation in 5 months, 15x in 1 yr
Latent Space · Oct 15, 2026
Beyond Average Error through Oracle-Informed Stress Tests for Time-Series Forecasting
arXiv · Sep 22, 2026