aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates how topology-aware large language models can effectively structure unstructured wind turbine maintenance logs, converting inconsistent field codes into reliable semantic data for reliability engineering. By automating the extraction of failure modes and actions across thousands of records with high confidence, the workflow significantly reduces manual review burdens while enabling advanced predictive analytics like FMEA. The study validates that LLMs are viable tools for enhancing asset lifecycle management in industrial settings where historical data quality is often poor.
Wind Turbine Maintenance Log Labelling Framework: LLM-Driven Data Correction and Enrichment via Semantic Extraction of Reliability Intelligence
arXiv:2605.31281v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As wind turbine fleets age, data-driven reliability engineering and maintenance optimisation are essential to manage lifecycle expenditure and support asset life extension. Historical maintenance records offer a vital source of field evidence, yet their analytical use is impeded by inconsistent system codes, generic categorical fields, and unstructured technician text. This paper presents a topology-aware large language model (LLM) workflow for reviewing legacy labels, extracting candidate maintenance and failure-mode taxonomies, and assigning structured semantic fields at record level. The workflow processed 16,316 maintenance records from 280 turbines across 32 onshore wind farms, spanning 9.2 years of operational history. It combines system-specific batch synthesis with granular labelling, deterministic exclusions, structured outputs, record-level provenance, and explicit review routes. Of 2,984 records targeted by three system-code tasks, 2,178 proposed labels met the operational acceptance rule of a 'High' self-reported confidence tier and no human-review flag. Accepted maintenance-type and action labels were assigned to 14,251 and 13,179 records, respectively. Failure-mode evidence profiles were assigned to 11,662 records; 3,441 records were classified as containing insufficient information, and 1,213 records were excluded as 'Not applicable' by deterministic workflow rules. The resulting fields reveal changes in system and maintenance-type distributions, a broader component-level action vocabulary, and topology-specific candidate evidence profiles. The recorded API expenditure was $368.86, or $0.0226 per processed record, and the total wall-clock duration was 6.83 hours. The provenance-linked outputs constitute candidate semantic evidence for subsequent multi-source event reconstruction, exposure-based reliability analysis, and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA).
Abstract:As wind turbine fleets age, data-driven reliability engineering and maintenance optimisation are essential to manage lifecycle expenditure and support asset life extension. Historical maintenance records offer a vital source of field evidence, yet their analytical use is impeded by inconsistent system codes, generic categorical fields, and unstructured technician text. This paper presents a topology-aware large language model (LLM) workflow for reviewing legacy labels, extracting candidate maintenance and failure-mode taxonomies, and assigning structured semantic fields at record level. The workflow processed 16,316 maintenance records from 280 turbines across 32 onshore wind farms, spanning 9.2 years of operational history. It combines system-specific batch synthesis with granular labelling, deterministic exclusions, structured outputs, record-level provenance, and explicit review routes. Of 2,984 records targeted by three system-code tasks, 2,178 proposed labels met the operational acceptance rule of a 'High' self-reported confidence tier and no human-review flag. Accepted maintenance-type and action labels were assigned to 14,251 and 13,179 records, respectively. Failure-mode evidence profiles were assigned to 11,662 records; 3,441 records were classified as containing insufficient information, and 1,213 records were excluded as 'Not applicable' by deterministic workflow rules. The resulting fields reveal changes in system and maintenance-type distributions, a broader component-level action vocabulary, and topology-specific candidate evidence profiles. The recorded API expenditure was $368.86, or $0.0226 per processed record, and the total wall-clock duration was 6.83 hours. The provenance-linked outputs constitute candidate semantic evidence for subsequent multi-source event reconstruction, exposure-based reliability analysis, and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA).
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2605.31281 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2605.31281v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.31281 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 336 words
Related coverage

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026
UniWind: Day-Ahead Wind Power Forecasting via Physics-Informed State Routing
arXiv · Oct 16, 2026

Article: The AI Productivity Paradox in Test Automation: Moving beyond Structural Validation to Perception and Intent
InfoQ · Jun 1, 2026
Does preservation make sense before we know how to revive?
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026