Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Why Oura delayed its IPO

Oura, the smart ring maker, cited “uncertainty” as its reason for delaying its much-anticipated public offering.
A few weeks ago, on my merry way to vacation, I wrote about Oura’s pending IPO and how, amazingly, in the AI era it was a smart ring maker we could rely on to take the go-public plunge. Not anymore: On Sept. 29, after a much-anticipated roadshow, Oura CEO Tom Hale delayed the plan, citing “uncertainty in the IPO market.” The obvious question: why get so close, then back off at the last minute? My colleague Morgan Chittum, who just joined Fortune and who Term Sheet readers will be hearing a lot more from soon, dug into this question in a recent piece. For one, she found, valuation proved tricky. As she writes, breaking down the numbers: Oura had proposed selling 50 million shares at $40 to $44…
Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 128 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site
Related coverage

Why Oura really pulled its IPO: Wall Street experts suspect valuation concerns, an insider cash-out, and an Apple-size threat
Fortune · Oct 6, 2026

Oura shelves its $2.2B IPO, citing ‘uncertainty’ in the market
TechCrunch · Sep 29, 2026

I tested the Ultrahuman Ring Pro: Rich in features, but still a hard sell
ZDNet · Jul 29, 2026

Wall Street’s big banks deliver mixed earnings. Executives bet the IPO lull won’t last
Fortune · Oct 14, 2026