Why Directly Learning Periodic Trajectories Can Fail

arXiv:2609.32254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Operator learning of periodic solutions requires deciding how simulation data should be recorded and represented. A natural choice is to integrate long enough for transients to decay and record a window wide enough to contain at least one full period of all trajectories. We find that these conservative choices can make the resulting trajectories difficult to learn, even when the underlying periodic orbits vary regularly with system parameters. Unaligned trajectories generalize poorly even within the training distribution. Phase alignment substantially improves in-distribution generalization, but models trained on a fixed physical-time window still have large errors on trajectories with periods outside the training range. We explain both failures through a common mechanism: frequency differences accumulate over time, so the target phase varies rapidly with the parameters. Predictors that cannot track this variation incur a population MSE floor in both settings; for fixed window prediction, we also derive a per-sample lower bound. We then study one of the simplest representations that escape these floors: learning an aligned, normalized waveform and its period separately. We establish regularity of the decoupled targets under ODE assumptions and show experimentally that this approach avoids both failures in ODE systems and a PDE case study.

Abstract:Operator learning of periodic solutions requires deciding how simulation data should be recorded and represented. A natural choice is to integrate long enough for transients to decay and record a window wide enough to contain at least one full period of all trajectories. We find that these conservative choices can make the resulting trajectories difficult to learn, even when the underlying periodic orbits vary regularly with system parameters. Unaligned trajectories generalize poorly even within the training distribution. Phase alignment substantially improves in-distribution generalization, but models trained on a fixed physical-time window still have large errors on trajectories with periods outside the training range. We explain both failures through a common mechanism: frequency differences accumulate over time, so the target phase varies rapidly with the parameters. Predictors that cannot track this variation incur a population MSE floor in both settings; for fixed window prediction, we also derive a per-sample lower bound. We then study one of the simplest representations that escape these floors: learning an aligned, normalized waveform and its period separately. We establish regularity of the decoupled targets under ODE assumptions and show experimentally that this approach avoids both failures in ODE systems and a PDE case study.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)

arXiv:2609.32254 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.32254v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32254 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Why Directly Learning Periodic Trajectories Can Fail

Related coverage