aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a critical benchmark for persistent speaker attribution, demonstrating that maintaining stable voice identities across multiple meetings significantly impacts the accuracy of long-term conversational memory systems. The study reveals that current commercial cascades often fail to track speakers consistently over time, while the proposed end-to-end approach achieves superior performance in noisy environments. For developers building AI assistants or meeting analytics tools, these findings highlight the necessity of evaluating speaker identity continuity rather than treating each recording in isolation.
Who Said What, and Will It Be Remembered? Evaluating Persistent Speaker Attribution Across Meetings
arXiv:2609.39344v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speech transcripts used as long-term memory must preserve both words and stable speaker identities. Existing meeting-transcription metrics either ignore speakers or remap anonymous speakers independently in each recording, so they cannot measure whether the same person retains one identity across meetings. We evaluate persistent speaker attribution with Speaker Identified cpWER (SI-cpWER), which scores a corpus under one global speaker-ID assignment. The benchmark covers five commercial diarize-then-identify cascades, two open academic baselines, and ThyVoice on the full 129-meeting CHiME-8 NOTSOFAR evaluation set in clean and noiseaugmented form, plus CHiME-6. ThyVoice is our end-to-end reference system; it repairs overlap and gates the evidence used to create and update voiceprints. Requiring persistent identity changes the commercial ranking: ThyVoice records lower SI-cpWER than every evaluated commercial cascade in all three conditions and the lowest mean in the full panel, 47.13 versus 54.75 for the next system. Complementary lexical, diarization, per-recording attribution, and speaker-clustering diagnostics characterize upstream error surfaces in the final attributed record. These results show why persistent attribution must be evaluated directly in systems that reuse conversations across time.
Title:Who Said What, and Will It Be Remembered? Evaluating Persistent Speaker Attribution Across Meetings
Abstract:Speech transcripts used as long-term memory must preserve both words and stable speaker identities. Existing meeting-transcription metrics either ignore speakers or remap anonymous speakers independently in each recording, so they cannot measure whether the same person retains one identity across meetings. We evaluate persistent speaker attribution with Speaker Identified cpWER (SI-cpWER), which scores a corpus under one global speaker-ID assignment. The benchmark covers five commercial diarize-then-identify cascades, two open academic baselines, and ThyVoice on the full 129-meeting CHiME-8 NOTSOFAR evaluation set in clean and noiseaugmented form, plus CHiME-6. ThyVoice is our end-to-end reference system; it repairs overlap and gates the evidence used to create and update voiceprints. Requiring persistent identity changes the commercial ranking: ThyVoice records lower SI-cpWER than every evaluated commercial cascade in all three conditions and the lowest mean in the full panel, 47.13 versus 54.75 for the next system. Complementary lexical, diarization, per-recording attribution, and speaker-clustering diagnostics characterize upstream error surfaces in the final attributed record. These results show why persistent attribution must be evaluated directly in systems that reuse conversations across time.
Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.39344 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2609.39344v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39344 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 286 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026

Reviewing my LessWrong post history with Claude
LessWrong · Oct 3, 2026